This NY Court of Appeals decision presents “a common issue under the Rent Stabilization Law (RSL): what is the proper method for calculating the recoverable rent overcharge for New York City apartments that were improperly removed from rent stabilization during receipt of J-51 benefits prior to (the NY Court of Appeals decision) in “Roberts v. Tishman Spyer Props., L.P.” (Roberts).
When leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals was granted in these cases, the RSL required that “absent, fraud, an overcharge was to be calculated by using the rent charged on the date four years prior to filing of the overcharge complaint (the ‘lookback’) as the ‘base date rent,’ adding any legal increases applicable during the four-year lookback…and computing the difference between that legal regulated rent and the rent actually charged to determine if the tenant was overcharged during the recovery period.” In those cases, “consideration of rental history predating the four-year lookback and statute of limitations (SOL) period was prohibited.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]