DiFiore Says Courts Have 'Obligation' to Continue In-Person Operations
In a video speech released on Monday, Chief Judge Janet DiFiore showed no signs of rolling back in-person operations already in place.
July 20, 2020 at 06:20 PM
3 minute read
New York's chief judge says the state court system has a "constitutional obligation" to transition back to in-person operations gradually, arguing they have put in place measures to hamper the spread of the coronavirus in courthouses.
Chief Judge Janet DiFiore's comments, included in a video speech released Monday, come days after a federal judge denied a temporary restraining order requested by public defender organizations in a suit against the state court system. The organizations sued over a decision to start certain in-person state court proceedings, saying the move discriminates against people with disabilities.
In a video speech released on Monday, DiFiore showed no signs of rolling back in-person operations already in place.
"So while virtual proceedings will continue to play an important role for us in limiting courthouse traffic, we are unwavering in our commitment to move forward, safely and responsibly, with in-person appearances in order to carry out our constitutional mission of fairly and speedily resolving cases, including those involving the constitutional rights of accused individuals, many of whom have been incarcerated since early in the pandemic," she said in the video.
There's a significant rise in the rate of dispositions and pleas when defendants and attorneys personally appear in front of a judge, DiFiore said. That, she argued, confirms the importance of continuing with the gradual restoration of in-person proceedings for pleas and sentencing, she said.
DiFiore said several trials that were suspended in March are now resuming. Grand jury operations are set to restart on Aug. 10 in New York City and grand juries were empaneled last week in every county outside the city, she said.
"The public rightfully expects, and must have confidence, that our courts are being faithful to our mission, doing justice, upholding the rule of law and responsibly standing against the disruption of the pandemic," she said in the video speech.
In the suit brought by the public defender organizations, the federal judge scheduled a telephone hearing for Tuesday.
Chief Administrative Judge Lawrence Marks was listed as a defendant in the suit, but DiFiore was not.
The lawsuit states that hundreds of clients and staff members with the public defender organizations have medical vulnerabilities that place them at a high risk of death or serious illness from the coronavirus.
"The completely unnecessary rush to throw hundreds of people back into the courts on almost no notice is nothing short of traumatic and irresponsible," the lawsuit argues.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readEric Adams Trial Set for April as Defense Urges Dismissal of Bribery Count
Major Drug Companies Agree to Pay $49.1 Million to 50 States, Territories
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 13 New Judges: Here's Who Kemp Just Appointed to the Bench
- 2Apple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
- 3Texas Supreme Court to Review "Implied" Performance Controversy in Oil-Gas Leases
- 4Collections Are Critical for Texas Law Firms Through Year's End
- 5US Judge Rejects Investor Claim That Target Hid Pandemic Inventory Issues
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250