New York Law Deans Back Diploma Privilege After Bar Exam Cancellation
Law graduates cannot wait indefinitely on plans for how they will become licensed during the COVID-19 pandemic, the deans wrote to the New York Court of Appeals and Governor Andrew Cuomo.
July 20, 2020 at 01:28 PM
4 minute read
The deans of all 15 law schools in New York have joined the push for an emergency diploma privilege that would let recent graduates become licensed without taking the bar exam.
In a July 17 letter to the New York Court of Appeals, Gov. Andrew Cuomo and several other elected officials, the deans requested the state adopt a diploma privilege "in the swiftest way possible." Their letter came one day after the Court of Appeals canceled the exam that was to be held in-person Sept. 9 and 10 without committing to any alternatives. (The September exam was a postponement of the traditional July bar exam.)
"The State of New York currently has no clear plan to facilitate the admission to the bar of thousands of our recent graduates," reads the deans' letter. "These graduates now are in a state of limbo, with a profound level of uncertainty and anxiety that surrounds their futures and economic stability as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic."
Meanwhile, state lawmakers are stepping up their efforts to enact a diploma privilege for law graduates. Assemblywoman Jo Anne Simon plans to introduce an updated version of an earlier bill that would create a diploma privilege. Under her revised bill, law graduates would be admitted to the bar in New York after completing 100 hours of practice under the supervision of an attorney. That diploma privilege would remain in effect until September 2021, or until the COVID-19 state of emergency has ended.
"Current applicants for the bar need to be able to begin the practice of law for which they have studied and, in many cases, taken on enormous student debt without endangering their health and safety and that of their families," reads a memo that accompanies Simon's revised bill.
Law graduates have been lobbying for a diploma privilege in New York for months. On July 13, an advocacy group called United for Diploma Privilege New York sent a letter to the Court of Appeals signed by more than 1,500 people requesting a hearing in which law graduates could make their case for an emergency diploma privilege amid the COVID-19 pandemic. A separate group last week sent a letter to Cuomo urging him to use his authority to implement a diploma privilege.
Asked for comment on the July 17 letter from the law deans, a court spokesman referred to a Monday update delivered by Court of Appeals Chief Judge Janet DiFiore that reiterated the expansion of a supervised practice program under which recent law gradates may practice until they have the chance to take the bar exam, and the creation of a work group to make recommendations on how to license new attorneys this year. That work group will look at whether New York should administer the abbreviated online bar exam being offered Oct. 5 and 6 by the National Conference of Bar Examiners, DiFiore said.
"The group is also considering whether New York should adopt an emergency diploma privilege in lieu of the bar exam or whether we should take any other immediate measures designed to ameliorate the difficulties faced by our 2020 law graduates," she said.
But the court's working group isn't expected to make any recommendations until early August. That's too long for law graduates to remain uncertain about their professional futures, the New York law deans argue. Recent graduates have quit jobs, taken leaves of absence, and taken out loans to fund their bar studies, they wrote.
"While we support the adoption of an online examination as an option, the excessive delay in making a final determination on such an exam places an undue burden on our graduates who have been studying intensively for licensure for the past two months in the midst of extreme public health concerns and hardship," reads the deans' letter.
Utah, Washington and Oregon have thus far adopted emergency diploma privileges in response to the challenges posed to the bar exam by COVID-19. But allowing aspiring attorneys to skip the exam has been a hard sell in many other jurisdictions. Minnesota, Illinois, Missouri and Colorado are among the growing number of jurisdictions where courts and licensing entities have recently denied diploma privilege petitions filed by examinees.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'No Evidence'?: Big Law Firms Defend Academic Publishers in EDNY Antitrust Case
3 minute read'Substantive Deficiencies': Judge Grants Big Law Motion Dismissing Ivy League Price-Fixing Claims
3 minute readLippman Study on Antisemitism at CUNY Weighs Free Speech, Unprotected Acts
'Illegal Conspiracy'?: EDNY Antitrust Class Action Challenges Publishers' 'Unpaid Peer Review Rule'
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250