Lawsuit Targets Allianz Over $774M in Losses Amid Pandemic Downturn
While the market has rebounded in recent months, stocks fell sharply in March, as large swaths of the economic began to shut down in response to the spread of COVID-19 and market volatility spiked.
July 21, 2020 at 04:34 PM
3 minute read
An Arkansas public pension fund has accused investment manager Allianz Global Investors of "misconduct and gross mismanagement" when it sought to reverse losses by doubling down on a series of bad trades just before the coronavirus pandemic ravaged the U.S. stock market earlier this year.
In a lawsuit filed late Monday in Manhattan federal court, the Arkansas Teacher Retirement System said it had suffered at least $774 million in losses as a result of a "reckless strategy" by Allianz and its parent company that abandoned risk controls on funds meant to weather severe market downturns.
"This strategy—undertaken with the assets of ATRS in the Alpha Funds—was a gamble that the expected market tsunami would turn out to be a drizzle," the pension fund's Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann and Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer attorneys said in the 53-page filing.
"In March 2020, however, as Allianz economists had predicted, investor uncertainty concerning the economic impact of the coronavirus triggered substantial (but hardly unprecedented) market volatility and prompted sharp declines in equity prices—and the Alpha Funds suffered catastrophic losses resulting from the volatility protection they had sold to other investors," the complaint said.
While the market has rebounded in recent months, stocks fell sharply in March, as large swaths of the economic began to shut down in response to the spread of COVID-19 and market volatility spiked. Later that month, Allianz was forced to liquidate two funds, and analysts downgraded others, including three held by ATRS during the downturn.
The suit is centered on Allianz' so-called Structured Alpha funds, which pursued a "market-neutral" strategy while also selling insurance against large market swings, the suit said. The complaint alleged that Allianz ignored the warnings of its own economists that conditions could worsen and gambled that risky trades would recoup losses it suffered in February.
"While AllianzGI was obligated to have positions in place to protect against losses in the event of a market downturn, in reality, the supposed hedges that AllianzGI executed merely locked in the losses, exacerbating a problem that was already spiraling out of control," the filing said.
In a statement, Allianz disputed the lawsuit's premise as "simply incorrect and without foundation," saying that the Structured Alpha portfolio "did not diverge from their investment strategy."
"Our own analysis has revealed that the portfolio was at all times managed to its alpha targets and in accordance with its design. While the losses suffered in the portfolio are deeply disappointing, there is no basis for legal liability," the company said. "AllianzGI intends to defend itself vigorously against these allegations."
The case, captioned Arkansas Teacher Retirement System v. Aliianz Global Investors, has been assigned to U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla of the Southern District of New York.
The complaint was surfaced by Legal Radar.
The pension fund is represented by Hannah Ross, Avi Josefson, James Harrod and Michael Blatchley of Bernstein Litowitz and Frederic S. Fox, Donald R. Hall, Melinda Campbell and Aaron Schwartz of Kaplan Fox.
Counsel for Allianz was not listed as of Tuesday afternoon.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
$17B Episcopal Church Pension Fund Hires New Legal Chief as Staff Changes Continue
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250