Recruiting & Hiring in Uncertain Times
The onset of COVID-19 reorganized the way law firms operate, triggering a wave of closures, furloughs and salary cuts. Norms established by century-old firms are being re-evaluated, and they now have the opportunity to rebuild better systems and practices from the ground up.
July 21, 2020 at 10:35 AM
5 minute read
The onset of COVID-19 reorganized the way law firms operate, triggering a wave of closures, furloughs and salary cuts, even among some titans of the bar. Norms established by century-old firms are being reevaluated, and we now have the opportunity to rebuild, from the ground up, better systems and practices not only in our own lives, but in the structure and operations of our firms.
Legal recruiting has been turned upside-down. Firms are working fully remotely, summer programs were delayed, shortened and eliminated, and the traditional hiring season for future summer associates has been altered. And while the long-standing firms continue to adjust their programs, young firms like mine are finding a new appreciation for the nimble approach that comes when firm culture is still formative, when law firm management is encouraged and supported in developing fresh talent, and when technology is state-of-the-art.
In many law firms in New York City, 2020 summer associate programs are completely virtual. For example, we are running a 10-week virtual program where I work at Selendy & Gay. Summer associate programs, often known for their lavish events and social gatherings, are at their core designed to show law students what it is like to practice law as an associate at your firm. While it is impossible to replicate some of the in-person experiences and interactions that we've grown accustomed to over the years, there are still ways to hold successful, meaningful programs. In fact, this year presents an unprecedented moment to recommit ourselves to that end.
Many summer associates are working remotely on case teams with partners, associates and paralegals, navigating the new normal of virtual case work, brief writing, depositions, arguments and virtual trials and arbitrations. Beyond traditional billable work, some law firms also are staffing each summer associate on various pro bono and public impact cases that the firms are handling. Showing summer associates the cases and causes the firm is passionate about—beyond commercial litigation—gives them more insight into the firm they hope to join. In this way, virtual programs can deliver the most vital elements of their predecessor programs.
Despite some of the limitations posed by remote operations, the need to deliver a sense of community, belonging and interpersonal connectedness is more important than ever. With no playbook in hand for virtual summer programs, we are adapting our options. Can we plan elaborate dinners at iconic dining institutions? Not this year. But does a partner have a spouse who is a professional chef willing to lead a virtual cooking class for summer associates and other attorneys to attend? Why yes, and isn't that cool? These experiences are not the same as those of prior years, but ultimately they don't have to be. They can be personal, functioning to bring people together in their living rooms and kitchens, bonding over our unique, unexpected commonalities, while holding true to the core goals of the summer associate program.
If firms are willing to transform the way they have historically approached summer programming they can still get to know each summer associate, their skills, creativity and ability to work in teams. Summers, in turn, will be able to assess whether a firm is the right place for them to begin their careers. They will meet, perhaps more easily in a virtual setting, the attorneys they would be working with and learning from, get a true sense of the type of work the firm handles on a regular basis, and experience the culture and DNA of the firm.
The impacts of COVID-19, quarantine, and mandatory work-from-home policies will stretch far beyond summer programs. Some of those effects will be positive. Ask most people in the legal industry, especially those who have worked in other sectors, and they'll acknowledge that law firms often lag behind in areas like remote work and IT infrastructure. We now have a chance to reconsider the status quo, and enact new policies and processes that suit our current conditions, many of which may correct age-old practices that haven't served the law firm model for quite some time.
Let's ask ourselves: Could we be utilizing new technologies to save our firms the cost of extensive travel for interviews? Is it possible to conduct on-campus interviews virtually? Would students feel less anxious about interviewing without the burden of cross-country flights and living out of hotel rooms? Could law firms potentially meet more students during OCI if they didn't need to spend the days before and after interviews traveling, while juggling client work simultaneously? The hypotheticals are endless, and so too could be the solutions, if we take the time to consider them. If we are too quick to return to the office, and an imagined sense of normalcy we are so craving, we could miss this rare opportunity to enact better, lasting change.
Peter Van Name is the manager of legal talent and recruiting at Selendy & Gay.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Unraveling of Sean Combs: How Legislation from the #MeToo Movement Brought Diddy Down
When It Comes to Local Law 97 Compliance, You’ve Gotta Have (Good) Faith
8 minute readFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Appellate Div. Follows Fed Reasoning on Recusal for Legislator-Turned-Judge
- 2SEC Obtained Record $8.2 Billion in Financial Remedies for Fiscal Year 2024, Commission Says
- 3Judiciary Law §487 in 2024
- 4Polsinelli's Revenue and Profits Surge Amid Partner De-Equitizations, Retirements
- 5Environmental Fines: Texas Secures Over $100M From Petrochemical Processor TPC Group
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250