Egon Schiele: Great Artist, Inmate and Pandemic Victim
Schiele is the only great painter who was incarcerated and a pandemic victim. His life and artistic creations are particularly timely and relevant during the present pandemic.
July 22, 2020 at 02:46 PM
4 minute read
Egon Schiele is a member of the club of great artists who died prematurely, incompletely creating and sharing their beauty and wisdom: Raphael, age 37; Mozart, 35; Shelley, 29; and, Keats, 25, to name just a few.
Schiele was born in 1890 in a small town near Vienna. He described his great grandfather as a "jurist." Schiele's father, a railroad employee, was a constant sketcher. So too was Egon by age 10, and possibly even younger. He was bored at elementary school, a distraction from art, and at age 16 he entered the Academy of Fine Arts in Vienna, being the youngest student in his class.
Traditional art instruction also bored him, and after some two and a half years, threatened with expulsion, he left. But by this time, age 18 of 19, he found his artistic independence. He was moving towards an aesthetics of expressionism, a high octane of psychological and emotional content, exaggerated poses and brush strokes, combined with a style that emphasized line and contour and the relationship between the figure and a background of colored but empty space.
As such, Schiele did not paint the female nude; rather, he painted naked women in the raw!
While Schiele was self-effacing in public, his private life was increasingly bohemian and demonstrative. He obviously enjoyed the mature female body, but he also had an affection for children, and soon this led to trouble with the law. In 1911, living in a rural community, Schiele was observed painting a nude underaged girl (the age of consent was 14) in his garden; he was evicted by his landlord and in essence drummed out of town. Moving to another small town, he continued to make friends with children and paint them in the nude.
In April 1912, a father of a girl filed a police complaint alleging kidnapping and rape. When the police went to Schiele's residence, which he voluntarily allowed them to enter and look about, they found depictions of nude female youngsters, and a third offense against public morality was added. Within days, Schiele received a summons to appear in municipal court.
While the official court record does not exist, and various commentaries by friends about this episode are ambiguous and conflicting, it is very likely that the following occurred: 1) Schiele timely appeared voluntarily with counsel in court; 2) he was not initially arrested, but held in custody to prevent communication with the complaining father's daughter (a perversion of CPL Article 620, securing attendance of a material witness); 3) the young lady told the authorities she was not kidnapped or raped, and these charges were dropped; 4) he must have at some point been officially charged because he was found guilty of the offense against public morality, and he was fined and sentenced to time served plus three additional days; and, 5) Schiele was incarcerated for a total of 24 days, and when discharged, he was psychologically traumatized.
In February 1915, Schiele was rejected for military service due to a congenitally weak heart. Some four months later, deteriorating military conditions led to another examination, and he was declared fit for limited service. He spent most of his military life guarding Russian prisoners, an experience that stirred compassionate feelings.
Schiele's incarceration and military service understandably had a profound influence on him and his art. There is a new symbolist content, a spiritual seeking, a humanistic expression and a new background of abstract shapes.
"Death and Maiden" (1915), considered by some as his masterpiece, powerfully expresses the sublime longing of a man and woman, for whatever reason, for human touch.
Schiele married in 1915. Two years later, his career exploded in success. Postwar Austria was economically stressed but socially and artistically more tolerant. Commissions poured in, he became a society portraitist, sales came easily. For the first time in his life he could live as he had dreamed.
In fall 1918, the flu pandemic raged in Austria. Schiele's wife, pregnant with their second child, died. Four days later, Egon Schiele died. He was 28.
______________________
David Lenefsky practices law in Manhattan. He is a resource in art history for The Young President's Organization.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhy Is It Becoming More Difficult for Businesses to Mandate Arbitration of Employment Disputes?
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Litera Acquires Document Automation Startup Offices & Dragons
- 2Patent Trolls Come Under Increasing Fire in Federal Courts
- 3Transforming Dispute Processes in Law: The Impact of Large Language Models
- 4Daniel Habib to Serve as Next Attorney-in-Charge of NY Federal Defender Appeals Unit
- 5Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege in the Modern Age of Communications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250