NY Legislature Approves Measure to Trim Sweeping Grant of Liability Immunity for Nursing Homes, Hospitals
Gov. Andrew Cuomo has said he could "see the rationale" in excluding lawsuit protections for cases not related to the coronavirus.
July 24, 2020 at 12:33 PM
4 minute read
New York lawmakers late Thursday voted to roll back portions of a sweeping legal immunity law given to nursing homes and hospitals.
The state Senate and Assembly passed a trim to the broad immunity law, which the Democrat-controlled chambers quietly passed this spring as New York faced the initial wave of coronavirus cases.
Gov. Andrew Cuomo must sign off on the legislation before it becomes law. The Democrat said Wednesday he could "see the rationale" in excluding lawsuit protections for cases not related to the coronavirus. Cuomo hedged the comments by saying he would have to look at the specifics of the bill.
The immunity law, which covered both civil and criminal liability, afforded nursing homes and hospitals broad protections against lawsuits.
Immunity law supporters argue that nursing homes and hospitals needed liability protections as workers faced an unprecedented crisis. Some health care interest groups say rolling back legal protections would undercut facilities' ability to recruit health care workers, especially if another coronavirus surge emerges.
Opponents to the immunity law say seeking justice through the courts is a fundamental principle and they argue the law lets nursing homes and hospitals off the hook for any poor care.
The passage of the new proposal falls short for those immunity opponents, who were pushing for a full repeal of the law.
The law has been shrouded by criticism of political influence on the part of the hospital and nursing home industry. That spotlight focused particularly on the Greater New York Hospital Association, which reported it drafted the immunity clause.
The association, which represents hospitals and health systems, has pumped millions of dollars into political committees in the last several years.
Sponsoring the bill in the state's lower chamber is Assemblyman Ron Kim, D-Queens, who also backed a measure to repeal the entire immunity clause. Kim said the new legislation is a good step in restoring the rights of patients and nursing home residents.
"Moving forward, nursing homes and other health care facilities will be held accountable for failing to prevent the spread of COVID-19 and that is a big win for our families, residents and workers," he said.
Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins, D-Westchester, said New York has moved past the initial crisis stage of the coronavirus pandemic and it makes sense to now limit the immunity's scope.
AARP state legislative representative Bill Ferris said the organization supports Cuomo approving the measure, but they "urge him to condition his approval on repeal of nursing home immunity completely and retroactively to the beginning of the pandemic."
There have been at least 6,300 confirmed or presumed coronavirus deaths at nursing homes across New York, according to state data. Long-running issues in the nursing home industry, such as low staffing, have been thrust into the national spotlight due to the pandemic.
The immunity law does not extend to willful criminal misconduct, gross negligence or reckless misconduct, but the law specifies that those definitions do not apply to "decisions resulting from a resource or staffing shortage."
The bill passed Thursday narrows the immunity coverage, specifically by removing protections against non-coronavirus cases. But it keeps the immunity law intact overall.
The legislation specifies that the immunity applies to the "assessment or care" of a person with a suspected or confirmed case of the coronavirus. It also removes "prevention" of the coronavirus from the definition of health care services.
Health care groups have opposed the proposed tweaks to the law.
Bea Grause, president of the Healthcare Association of New York State, said the state should be encouraging volunteers to step up if there's another coronavirus surge in New York, something the bill does not accomplish.
"HANYS is deeply disappointed in the Legislature's change in heart regarding these time-limited liability protections. We are still in the middle of this pandemic," she said.
READ MORE:
New York Bill Would Narrow Legal Immunity for Hospitals, Nursing Homes
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHealth Care Data Breach Class Actions Saw December Surge in NY Courts
Big Tech and Internet Companies Slammed With Consumer Class Actions in December
Amid Growing Litigation Volume, Don't Expect UnitedHealthcare to Change Its Stripes After CEO's Killing
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1We the People?
- 2New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 3No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 4Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 5Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250