Federal Prosecutors Urge Court to Reject Ghislaine Maxwell's Request to Publicly Identify Epstein Accusers
Maxwell had sought an order that would allow her to publicly identify any women who had spoken about their encounters with her longtime confidant Jeffrey Epstein in the media or in civil litigation. Prosecutors said her demand was "unnecessary and inappropriate" and threatened the "dignity and privacy" of Epstein's accusers.
July 28, 2020 at 06:58 PM
4 minute read
Manhattan federal prosecutors on Tuesday said there was "no legal basis" to Ghislaine Maxwell's request to identify the women who have come forward as victims of deceased financier Jeffrey Epstein in her criminal sex-trafficking case.
The response came amid a dispute between Maxwell's defense attorneys and the Manhattan U.S. Attorney's Office over a protective order governing dispute in the case, which accused Maxwell, Epstein's longtime confidante and former romantic interest, of enabling his abuses.
Maxwell had sought an order that would allow her to publicly identify any women who had spoken about their encounters with Epstein in the media or in civil litigation. According to Maxwell's submission Monday, the move would allow Maxwell and her defense team to "conduct further factual investigation, prepare witnesses for trial, and advocate" on her behalf.
Prosecutors, however, said Maxwell's demand was "extraordinarily broad, unnecessary and inappropriate" and threatened the "dignity and privacy" of Epstein's accusers, who were as young as 14 years old when they first encountered the Manhattan- and South Florida-based financier, according to court documents.
"In essence, the defendant's proposal seeks authorization to drag into the public glare any victim who has ever made any type of public statement of victimization—no matter how long ago or how brief—without that victim's knowing consent and without any substantive justification," prosecutors said in a seven-page letter to U.S. District Judge Alison J. Nathan of the Southern District of New York.
Rather, they said, Maxwell should only be able to identify women who choose to speak on the record in Maxwell's prosecution.
So far, only one woman, Annie Farmer, has spoken out publicly in the case, when she asked Nathan at a July 14 hearing to deny Maxwell bail. A second woman submitted a written statement at the hearing, but did so under a pseudonym. Under the government's proposal, her identity would not be made public.
Maxwell was charged earlier this month with two counts of conspiracy, enticement of a minor to travel to engage in illegal sex acts and transporting minors for illegal sex acts. She also faces two perjury charges for allegedly lying in civil depositions about Epstein's alleged abuses of young girls.
Maxwell, who pleaded not guilty, was denied bail and is awaiting her planned trial next June from a Brooklyn jail cell.
Epstein died in federal custody last year in an apparent suicide, ending the criminal case against him. Prosecutors have said that an investigation of his employees and associates remains ongoing.
Maxwell and the U.S. Attorney's Office are also at odds over the disclosure of discovery materials to potential witnesses in the case. Maxwell's attorneys have asked that the witnesses and their counsel be subject to the same protocols as the defense, and that they be barred from using any documents in civil litigation or otherwise disseminating them to the public.
In the letter Tuesday, assistant U.S. Attorneys said the government was already under "extensive restrictions" regarding its sharing of discovery, and said Maxwell's concerns were "irrelevant" in the context of a criminal protective order.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readTrump, ABC News Settlement in Defamation Lawsuit Includes $1M in Attorney Fees For President-Elect
Trending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250