NY AG Letitia James Says Fees, Probe May Be Needed in DHS Reversal on Global Entry Ban
In a court filing Tuesday night, the attorney general's office said it was seeking attorney fees and costs in its lawsuit, which challenged the ban as unconstitutional. The attorneys also said that "additional relief" may be appropriate for the "imposition and maintenance of a ban that they have now conceded was without factual foundation."
July 29, 2020 at 12:12 PM
4 minute read
New York state Attorney General Letitia James has asked a federal judge to consider a possible inquiry into false statements from the Trump administration that led the Manhattan U.S. Attorney's Office to retract arguments in defense of a policy to exclude New York from federal programs intended to expedite international travel.
In a court filing Tuesday night, the attorney general's office said it was seeking attorney fees and costs in its lawsuit, which challenged the ban as unconstitutional. The attorneys also said that "additional relief" may be appropriate for the "imposition and maintenance of a ban that they have now conceded was without factual foundation."
"Plaintiffs believe further inquiry may be warranted to determine when the agency first became aware of the false and misleading representations that were disclosed last week, and what steps were taken and when to cure those misrepresentations," the filing said.
The Manhattan U.S. Attorney's Office, which is representing the Department of Homeland Security in the suit, acknowledged July 23 that the agency had incorrectly asserted that New York was unique in its refusal to give federal authorities access to state Department of Motor Vehicles records without a court order.
Those misleading statements, the office said, had undermined a "central argument" in its motions for summary judgment and to dismiss New York's lawsuit. According to the filing, multiple states, Washington, D.C. and a U.S. territory all had similar prohibitions against sharing information with the federal government.
"Defendants deeply regret the foregoing inaccurate or misleading statements and apologize to the court and plaintiffs for the need to make these corrections at this late stage in the litigation," acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss said in a court filing last week.
DHS announced last week that it was reinstating New York to the Global Entry and Trusted Traveler programs, which allow low-risk travelers to receive expedited clearance and avoid long lines at airport security.
Attorneys for the Trump administration argued in their own filing Tuesday that the reversal amounted to a "change in law," which rendered New York's lawsuit moot.
James' office, however, argued Tuesday that the state was entitled to full relief, saying DHS officials had not given the office any assurances that they wouldn't try to "reimpose the ban just as quickly as they lifted it." Both sides had agreed to talks on whether the dispute could be resolved through a settlement that would include attorney fees and costs, the state attorneys said.
The parties were expected to update the court by Aug. 10 on the status of the negotiations.
In the filing, James' office said that "further explanation or additional discovery" may be needed as to what exactly DHS "knew and when" with regard to the false and misleading statements. The court, the attorneys noted, also had the "inherent authority" to take up its own investigation "to determine whether it has been the victim of fraud."
James and New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo have long argued that New York was being singled out for political retribution in response to its so-called Green Light Law, which restricted information-sharing with federal immigration officials, as well as other policies that put it at odds with President Donald Trump. The state has since amended its law to give federal authorities access to motor vehicle records of those who apply for trusted-traveler status and for cars being shipped in and out of the country.
Last week, Cuomo called for investigations and possible criminal sanctions at DHS, and castigated acting Secretary of Homeland Security Chad Wolf and his deputy Ken Cuccinelli for using their offices to carry out acts of political revenge.
Wolf, for his part, has said that officials at DHS "remain very concerned" that aspects of the new law still jeopardized national security, adding that "we'll continue to work with our Department of Justice colleagues to see what we can do, perhaps through the legal system, to address those concerns."
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readTrump, ABC News Settlement in Defamation Lawsuit Includes $1M in Attorney Fees For President-Elect
Trending Stories
- 1Georgia Supreme Court Honoring Troutman Pepper Partner, Former Chief Justice
- 2Insurer Not Required to Cover $29M Wrongful Death Judgment, Appeals Court Rules
- 3Slideshow: Jewish Bar Association of Georgia Marks 1st Year With Hanukkah Party
- 4Holland & Knight Launches Export Control Disputes and Advocacy Team
- 5Blake Lively's claims that movie co-star launched smear campaign gets support in publicist's suit
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250