NY AG Letitia James Says Fees, Probe May Be Needed in DHS Reversal on Global Entry Ban
In a court filing Tuesday night, the attorney general's office said it was seeking attorney fees and costs in its lawsuit, which challenged the ban as unconstitutional. The attorneys also said that "additional relief" may be appropriate for the "imposition and maintenance of a ban that they have now conceded was without factual foundation."
July 29, 2020 at 12:12 PM
4 minute read
New York state Attorney General Letitia James has asked a federal judge to consider a possible inquiry into false statements from the Trump administration that led the Manhattan U.S. Attorney's Office to retract arguments in defense of a policy to exclude New York from federal programs intended to expedite international travel.
In a court filing Tuesday night, the attorney general's office said it was seeking attorney fees and costs in its lawsuit, which challenged the ban as unconstitutional. The attorneys also said that "additional relief" may be appropriate for the "imposition and maintenance of a ban that they have now conceded was without factual foundation."
"Plaintiffs believe further inquiry may be warranted to determine when the agency first became aware of the false and misleading representations that were disclosed last week, and what steps were taken and when to cure those misrepresentations," the filing said.
The Manhattan U.S. Attorney's Office, which is representing the Department of Homeland Security in the suit, acknowledged July 23 that the agency had incorrectly asserted that New York was unique in its refusal to give federal authorities access to state Department of Motor Vehicles records without a court order.
Those misleading statements, the office said, had undermined a "central argument" in its motions for summary judgment and to dismiss New York's lawsuit. According to the filing, multiple states, Washington, D.C. and a U.S. territory all had similar prohibitions against sharing information with the federal government.
"Defendants deeply regret the foregoing inaccurate or misleading statements and apologize to the court and plaintiffs for the need to make these corrections at this late stage in the litigation," acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss said in a court filing last week.
DHS announced last week that it was reinstating New York to the Global Entry and Trusted Traveler programs, which allow low-risk travelers to receive expedited clearance and avoid long lines at airport security.
Attorneys for the Trump administration argued in their own filing Tuesday that the reversal amounted to a "change in law," which rendered New York's lawsuit moot.
James' office, however, argued Tuesday that the state was entitled to full relief, saying DHS officials had not given the office any assurances that they wouldn't try to "reimpose the ban just as quickly as they lifted it." Both sides had agreed to talks on whether the dispute could be resolved through a settlement that would include attorney fees and costs, the state attorneys said.
The parties were expected to update the court by Aug. 10 on the status of the negotiations.
In the filing, James' office said that "further explanation or additional discovery" may be needed as to what exactly DHS "knew and when" with regard to the false and misleading statements. The court, the attorneys noted, also had the "inherent authority" to take up its own investigation "to determine whether it has been the victim of fraud."
James and New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo have long argued that New York was being singled out for political retribution in response to its so-called Green Light Law, which restricted information-sharing with federal immigration officials, as well as other policies that put it at odds with President Donald Trump. The state has since amended its law to give federal authorities access to motor vehicle records of those who apply for trusted-traveler status and for cars being shipped in and out of the country.
Last week, Cuomo called for investigations and possible criminal sanctions at DHS, and castigated acting Secretary of Homeland Security Chad Wolf and his deputy Ken Cuccinelli for using their offices to carry out acts of political revenge.
Wolf, for his part, has said that officials at DHS "remain very concerned" that aspects of the new law still jeopardized national security, adding that "we'll continue to work with our Department of Justice colleagues to see what we can do, perhaps through the legal system, to address those concerns."
READ MORE:
Zoom Agrees to Security Measures After NY Attorney General Investigation
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'You Became a Corrupt Politician': Judge Gives Prison Time to Former Sen. Robert Menendez for Corruption Conviction
5 minute readFederal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Plan Suit
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Securities Action Targeting Polestar Alleges Mistakes in SEC Filings
- 2Conspiracy Suits Against Quinn Emanuel, Roc Nation Moved to Federal District Court
- 3'Knowledge of Mismatch:' Fed Judge Offers Guidance on How to Hold Banks Accountable for Erroneous Transfers
- 4PAGA Claims Must Now Be 'Headed'
- 5Million-Dollar Verdict: Broward Jury Sides With Small Business
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250