A Manhattan federal judge has struck down a rarely invoked New York state law that prohibited picketing outside courthouses, finding that the decades-old statute violated First Amendment rights to free speech.

U.S. District Judge Denise Cote of the Southern District of New York ruled Wednesday that the 1952 law, which bans shouting and signage within 200 feet of a courthouse, was "facially unconstitutional" because it was a "content-based restriction on speech in a public forum that fails strict scrutiny."

The ruling came in the case of Michael Picard, who was arrested in 2017 while advocating for jury nullification outside the Bronx County Hall of Justice. The charges against Picard were later dropped, in part because the arresting officer had not measured out the distance between Picard and the building.

Picard, however, filed suit against Bronx County District Attorney Darcel Clark and the chief of safety for the New York Unified Court System, saying that he had not demonstrated since his arrest for fear of prosecution under the statute, which dated back to gatherings protesting the prosecution of Communist Party leaders outside a New York federal courthouse in 1949.

Government lawyers argued that the statute was narrowly tailored to prevent the disruption and undue influence of trials, and that it complemented other state laws against jury tampering and the obstruction of governmental administration. Only four people, they said, had been arrested in the last 14 years.

While Cote found a compelling state interest in protecting court proceedings, she said the government had "not shown that the state must criminalize speech in this way to protect the integrity of ongoing trials," and there were other ways to enforce order and maintain access to public buildings.

According to Cote, lawyers for the state officials were not able to offer a more narrow reading of the law, and she declined to "rewrite" the statute to conform with the constitutional requirements.

"To the extent that speakers are obstructing passage on the sidewalks or engaging with others in demonstrations, there are content-neutral regulations to maintain public order and access to a public building. And, of course, there are laws that make it a crime to tamper intentionally with jurors and witnesses," Cote wrote in an 18-page opinion.

"And, while it may pose a not inconsiderable burden on the court system, if jurors or witnesses must be escorted to and from the courthouse to encourage or protect their service on a particular trial, that can be done as well," she said.

Brian Hauss, who represented Picard, said in a statement that he was "glad the court struck down this blatantly unconstitutional law."

"People have a First Amendment right to speak out about the criminal justice system in the public square. The government cannot criminalize protest on public streets and sidewalks," said Hauss, a staff attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union.

The New York City Law Department and the New York Attorney General's Office did not immediately provide comment on the ruling.

The case was captioned Picard v. Magliano.

READ MORE: