Ghislaine Maxwell Loses Bid to Publicly Name Epstein Accusers in Criminal Sex Trafficking Case
In a three-page ruling, the judge sided with prosecutors in finding that Maxwell's proposal went too far seeking to out accusers across a variety of fora.
July 31, 2020 at 12:11 PM
4 minute read
A Manhattan federal judge on Friday rejected Ghislaine Maxwell's request to name the women who have come forward in the media and on other platforms as victims of deceased financier and accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.
The ruling, from U.S. District Judge Alison J. Nathan, came amid a battle between Maxwell's attorneys and federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York over a protective order order governing discovery in the case, which accuses the former British socialite and Epstein's longtime confidante of enabling the millionaire's abuses.
Maxwell's defense team had sought to identify any victims who had publicly spoken about their encounters with Epstein and Maxwell in the media or in the context of civil litigation.
The Manhattan U.S. Attorney's Office, however, resisted that call as overly broad, and said that it threatened the "dignity and privacy" of Epstein's accusers, some of whom were as young as 14 years old when they first met the Manhattan- and South Florida-based financier. Instead, they argued, only victims who came forward to speak on the record in Maxwell's criminal case should be identified.
In a three-page ruling, Nathan sided with prosecutors in finding that Maxwell's proposal went too far seeking to out accusers across a variety of fora.
"Not all accusations or public statements are equal," she said, and the victims "still maintain a significant privacy interest that must be safeguarded."
"Deciding to participate in or contribute to a criminal investigation or prosecution is a far different matter than simply making a public statement 'relating to' Ms. Maxwell or Jeffrey Epstein, particularly since such a statement might have occurred decades ago and have no relevance to the charges in this case," Nathan wrote.
"The exception the defense seeks is too broad and risks undermining the protections of the privacy of witnesses and alleged victims that is required by law," she said.
So far, only one woman, Annie Farmer, has spoken out by name in Maxwell's case. Another unnamed woman submitted a written statement at Maxwell's bail hearing earlier this month, but under Nathan's order she would not be identified in the proceedings.
Maxwell, who pleaded not guilty to charges of conspiracy, enticement of a minor to travel to engage in illegal sex acts, transporting minors for illegal sex acts and perjury, was denied bail July 14 and is waiting out a planned July 2021 trial from a Brooklyn jail cell.
Epstein died in federal custody last summer while awaiting his own trial on sex trafficking charges. His death, which was ruled a suicide, ended the criminal case against him, but an investigation of Epstein's employees and associates remains ongoing in the Southern District.
For Maxwell, Nathan's ruling was the latest in a string of losses in both criminal and civil proceedings. Late Thursday, a trove of documents were made public, over her attorney's objections in civil litigation, which showed Maxwell's correspondences with Epstein as recently as 2015.
A federal judge in that case had slammed Maxwell's attempts to "muddy the waters" just before the documents were set to be made public.
On Friday, Nathan also rejected Maxwell's bid to prevent the government from disclosing discovery materials to potential witnesses in the case. In her ruling, Nathan noted that the request "appeared unprecedented despite the fact that there have been many high-profile criminal matters that had related civil litigation."
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readTrump, ABC News Settlement in Defamation Lawsuit Includes $1M in Attorney Fees For President-Elect
Trending Stories
- 1Data Breach Lawsuit Against Byte Federal Among 1,500 Targeting Companies in 2024
- 2Counterfeiters Ride Surge in Tabletop Games’ Popularity, Challenging IP Owners to Keep Up
- 3Health Care Data Breach Class Actions Saw December Surge in NY Courts
- 4Florida Supreme Court Disbars 3, Suspends 11, Reprimands 1 in Final Disciplinary Order of 2024
- 5Chief Justice Roberts Ends Year With Defense Against 'Illegitimate' Attacks on Judiciary
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250