There was much anticipation when the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari in and then decided a case addressing whether design elements of clothing could be protected by copyright, Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands, Inc., 137 S. Ct. 1002 (2017).   Over time, the range of copyright-eligible creations had expanded greatly to include creative works such as motion pictures, recorded music and choreography. But when it came to items that people wear, no matter how creative or how costly, fashion was a copyright no-go in the United States. Would fashion join movies, records and ballet in the circle of copyright protection?

After the decision, commentators were divided. Some felt Star Athletica approved a path to relatively quick and inexpensive protection for clothing design, at least in some situations. Others felt the holding was so limited that it added only modest potential protection for fashion designs. A little more than three years on, what has been the decision’s impact?

The Context

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]