The Gov't Tool You've Never Heard of That Conceals Police Misconduct
Today, more than ever, police misconduct must be exposed and condemned, but government-extracted appeal waivers not only strip individuals of their fundamental right to appellate review, but also shield police misconduct from the public eye.
September 18, 2020 at 10:00 AM
8 minute read
Few in the general public, even those deeply committed to criminal justice reform, have ever heard of appeal waivers. Yet such waivers should be on the radar screen of anyone interested in true reform. Appeal waivers are neither innocuous nor technical. They are ubiquitous, insidious, and stealthy weapons used by the government to strip individuals of fundamental protections against law enforcement's overreach. Until the state Legislature takes the necessary step of abolishing all appellate waivers, it should enact a simple fix to a single statute that would put a quick end to one of the worst abuses these waivers occasion—insulating police misconduct, predominantly perpetrated against Black and brown New Yorkers, from exposure through vital appellate review.
Guilty Pleas, Forfeiture, and Right to Appeal
To understand the iniquity this article addresses, the starting point is the guilty plea that the appeal waiver accompanies. When an individual pleads guilty, even without an appeal waiver, he or she automatically forfeits the constitutional rights and protections associated with going to trial (e.g., a jury's determination of guilt or innocence, confrontation, testifying in one's own behalf).
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDon’t Blow It: 10 Lessons From 10 Years of Nonprofit Whistleblower Policies
9 minute readFusion Voting and Its Impact on the Upcoming Election
Trending Stories
- 1Indian Law Firm Cyril Amarchand Rolls Out AI Strategy, Adopts Suite of AI Tools
- 2Which Legal Tech Jobs Are on the Rise, and Which Aren't, with Jared Coseglia
- 3Absent Explicit Agreement, Court Rejects Unilateral Responsiveness Redaction of Text Messages
- 4SEC Whistleblower Program: What to Expect Under the Trump Administration
- 5Sidley Hires Paul Hastings Energy Finance Partner in Houston
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250