A state appeals court has tossed out a legal malpractice lawsuit launched by a former client against a matrimonial law firm after the former client hired the firm to represent him in divorcing his wife, fired the firm one month after a note of issue was filed in the action, hired a replacement law firm and then settled the divorce for an amount he was not satisfied with.

In addressing the legal malpractice action brought by plaintiff Louis Katsoris against the White Plains-based firm of BodnarMilone, an Appellate Division, Second Department panel called the malpractice claim “conclusory” and wrote that the “general allegations” that “the plaintiff [Katsoris] was caused to incur ‘additional legal fees’” to the second law firm and suffered “’adverse financial consequences,’ and ‘direct financial damage,’ were all conclusory and inadequate to constitute actual, ascertainable damages.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]