David M. Barshay No-Fault Insurance Law Wrap-Up: New Fee Schedule Takes Effect
Certain ground rules contained in the revised fee schedule (requiring that chiropractors, podiatrists and psychologists bill only under their own respective fee schedules), however, took effect for no-fault claims on April 1, 2019, writes No-Fault Insurance Law Wrap-Up columnist David M. Barshay.
October 07, 2020 at 12:40 PM
11 minute read
As we previously reported in our No-Fault Insurance Law Wrap-Up (NYLJ, April 10, 2019), the new Worker's Compensation Fee Schedule, as applicable to no-fault medical claims, takes effect for services rendered on or after Oct.1. The effective date for workers' compensation claims was April 1, 2019, but it was delayed for 18 months for no-fault claims to permit automobile insurers sufficient time to determine and mitigate the effects of any increases in claims payments and any increases in premiums resulting therefrom. See 35th amendment to Insurance Regulation 83 (11 NYCRR 68.1). Certain ground rules contained in the revised fee schedule (requiring that chiropractors, podiatrists and psychologists bill only under their own respective fee schedules), however, took effect for no-fault claims on April 1, 2019.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
New York Court of Appeals Tightens Pleading Standards Against Insurance Policyholder
7 minute read
Amid Growing Litigation Volume, Don't Expect UnitedHealthcare to Change Its Stripes After CEO's Killing
6 minute read
GE Agrees to $362.5M Deal to End Shareholder Claims Over Power, Insurance Risks
2 minute read
GEICO, Travelers to Pay NY $11.3M for Cybersecurity Breaches
Trending Stories
- 1Pre-Internet High Court Ruling Hobbling Efforts to Keep Tech Giants from Using Below-Cost Pricing to Bury Rivals
- 2Benjamin West and John Singleton Copley: American Painters in London
- 3I Aim to Make a Positive Change in Everyday Interactions, Tracey Wishert Says
- 4Connecticut Is Updating its Environmental Justice Regulations
- 5Navigating Florida's Products Liability Law: Defective Products, Warnings and the Pursuit of Justice
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
