Brooklyn Law Firm Sues Over Lockdown Plan Targeting Coronavirus Clusters
Turturro Law in Brooklyn is arguing that it doesn't hold mass gatherings and operates within a safe and controlled environment, complying with coronavirus protocols.
October 08, 2020 at 10:48 AM
3 minute read
Gov. Andrew Cuomo's plan to combat coronavirus clusters in New York City quickly drew a lawsuit from a Brooklyn law firm Thursday.
Turturro Law in Brooklyn is located in a red zone where nonessential businesses are forced to shut down due to the state's plan to battle a coronavirus cluster in the borough. Officials say the initiative is particularly aimed at tackling mass gatherings where the virus can be easily spread.
But, the law firm says it doesn't hold mass gatherings and operates within a safe and controlled environment, complying with coronavirus protocols.
"The initiative, which was hastily implemented by defendant Cuomo in an effort to target mass gatherings in the city (and other locations) because of a locality's failure to enforce 'social distancing rules' and 'mask mandates,'" reads the lawsuit, which was filed in the federal Eastern District of New York.
Due to the cluster restrictions, government officials have effectively ordered the law firm "to cease all or most of its operations without any sort of hearing or formal procedure," the lawsuit argues.
The state has faced a wave of litigation in recent months over its coronavirus restrictions, particularly from businesses that were forced to shut down. The rules have been credited with bringing down the state's coronavirus figures.
Federal courts have largely sided with state officials in those cases. But the Turturro Law litigation is perhaps the first launched against the cluster restriction scheme—a new initiative that only affects a limited geographic area.
Cuomo rolled out a tiered plan Tuesday to fight new infections in coronavirus hot spots, which were identified in parts of Brooklyn, Queens and Orange and Rockland counties.
In red zones under the plan, law firm offices and nonessential businesses are shuttered, indoor and outdoor dining is banned and mass gatherings are not allowed. Certain in-person legal work is permitted within the red zones.
The restrictions are less stringent in the areas surrounding the red zones—orange and yellow zones. In the less-restrictive zones, law firms are able to operate their offices.
The lawsuit argues that the zones are arbitrary, and there's "no scientific or other rational basis" to support them.
"There is no lawful basis for suggesting that the public's health or safety is furthered by shuttering a non-essential law office in a 'red zone' while a non-essential law office located several blocks away in an orange or yellow zone remains open," according to the lawsuit.
Plus, the law firm adapted to comply with certain protocols, like temperature checks and coronavirus questioning for workers and clients when they come into the firm's location.
The lawsuit argues the cluster initiative "constitutes an arbitrary, capricious, irrational, and abusive conduct which unlawfully interferes with Turturro Law's liberty and property interests."
Cuomo and New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio are listed as defendants in the litigation.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
'Playing the Clock'?: Hochul Says NY's Discovery Loophole Is to Blame for Wide Dismissal of Criminal Cases
So Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1‘Catholic Charities v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission’: Another Consequence of 'Hobby Lobby'?
- 2With DEI Rollbacks, Employment Lawyers See Potential For Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality
- 3In-House Legal Network The L Suite Acquires Legal E-Learning Platform Luminate+
- 4In Police Shooting Case, Kavanaugh Bleeds Blue and Jackson ‘Very Very Confused’
- 5Trump RTO Mandates Won’t Disrupt Big Law Policies—But Client Expectations Might
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250