Distinguished Leader: Sandra Goldstein
Senior Litigation Partner at Kirkland & Ellis
October 23, 2020 at 10:16 AM
4 minute read
What are some of your proudest recent achievements?
The most memorable cases are the most challenging ones, where hard work and creative thinking result in an important win for the client that also changes the legal landscape, particularly when the market perception is that it can't be done. The City of Livonia matter was a memorable recent case. We won a precedent‑setting PSLRA discovery stay for Pitney Bowes and its directors in securities litigation in state court—the first time a defense firm has succeeded in doing so over a plaintiff's objection in more than two decades. After the Supreme Court's Cyan decision, which held that certain federal securities claims may be brought in state court, many commentators believed, and several courts held, that the PSLRA stay of discovery in federal court does not apply in state court because the stay is supposedly procedural. We refused to concede, as defense firms had for years, that that was the pivotal issue, arguing instead that the broad and clear congressional language—which is supreme under the Constitution, even in state court—required a finding that the discovery stay applied in state court, regardless of whether it is procedural or substantive. So many others had skipped this point. We subsequently won case dismissal. It was great to successfully argue both the motion to stay and motion to dismiss before the Connecticut Superior Court. Writing strong, targeted, persuasive briefs and presenting clear oral argument, for an audience unfamiliar with the securities laws were the keys here.
In another rewarding case, I successfully argued and won dismissal for First Citizens BancShares of merger litigation clearing the way for Delaware companies to enact forum-selection bylaws in conjunction with deals, even in anticipation of litigation – an issue of first impression. This decision, which was later codified by the state legislature, has changed the way parties draft merger agreements, and led to a reduction in multi-jurisdictional litigation.
Name a lawyer or mentor whose leadership inspired you.
My mother. She was a trial lawyer for 22 years before being named a judge—first, a Civil Court judge, then a New York Supreme Court judge, and then a Justice on the Appellate Division, Second Department—at a time when it was rare for women to work in the law. In fact, when she graduated at the top of her class—as one of only four women—at Brooklyn Law School in 1956, it was unheard of for a woman to be valedictorian, so the school had the male salutatorian deliver the speech at graduation.
How are the business and profession of law changing and how should lawyers adapt for the future?
Always be mindful of the best way to communicate with your clients and colleagues. Don't forget that, despite advancements in technology and our ability to work remotely, some messages are best received, and topics most appropriately worked through, when done face-to-face, or at least by picking up the phone to resolve an issue live. Sorting through this—client-by-client, issue-by-issue—is particularly challenging—but as important—during this period of social distancing.
What is the best advice someone considering a career in the law, or someone already in the profession who is seeking to make a greater impact?
Work hard and take ownership of your matters. Be proactive; don't wait for someone to ask you to do something. Keep in constant contact with your client to understand their wants and needs, and make sure to update them on both substantive and administrative developments. Most importantly, never just accept someone else's blueprint for how to litigate a matter, and always focus on your client's goals! You may have a case with a similar fact pattern to one that's already been litigated and involving the same legal issues, opposing counsel or judge. But every client is different, and you need to tailor your approach and develop a strategy that will work best for each client.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllClimate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250