Helping Biden Mend Criminal Justice
What should/must Biden commit to? Otherwise put, what would help return American to a normalcy that has been missing?
November 09, 2020 at 11:30 AM
10 minute read
Joe Biden has won, happily so in my opinion. He unquestionably stands for the same core principles of American justice that most who will read this would probably embrace. Still, although he was chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee from 1987 to 1995, because he was preoccupied with other priorities while Foreign Relations Committee chair, Vice President and afterwards, Biden undoubtedly hasn't intensely focused on American justice, warts and all, for many years—particularly ever since the time he held significant responsibility for the now-notorious Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act—the "1994 Crime Bill."
Biden did acknowledge the error of that bill; he sponsored the Second Chance Act and supported the Obama-era Fair Sentencing Act. And, yes, he has the former attorney general of California as his Veep. But suppose President-elect Biden were to ask for a back of the envelope "eight things" to help repair American justice, particularly given the Trump Administration's often egregious and sometimes bizarre notions of justice that has often driven it to the brink. What should/must Biden commit to? Otherwise put, what would help return America to a normalcy that has been missing since President Trump and his attorneys general chose to become unambiguously sycophantic to the President's uncommonly partisan or political goals for the Justice Department—goals often designed to appeal to the base?
Curing the partisan nature of the Attorney General as de facto "lawyer for the president." In retrospect, Robert Kennedy should never have been President Kennedy's attorney general. As the President's brother, the inherent conflicts created by the obvious nepotism were all too apparent. Appropriately, the Congress later acted to make such an appointment unlawful. But an attorney general needn't be the president's relative to be conflicted—Attorney General Barr's unbending course of conduct has made that clear.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFalling Back in Love With Certain Estate Planning Strategies in a Falling Interest Rate Environment
9 minute readNavigating Complex Capital Waters: Preferred Equity in Special Situations
8 minute readExploring the Current State of Middle-Market M&A: Deal Term Trends and Emerging Optimism
8 minute readThe Locked Box Mechanism in Private M&A Transactions: A Streamlined Approach
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Meet the Lawyers on Kamala Harris' Transition Team
- 5Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250