'Arthrex': Do PTAB Judges Require Presidential Appointment?
In his Patent and Trademark Law column, Rob Maier discusses Arthrex v. Smith & Nephew, where Arthrex which challenged whether the appointment of administrative patent judges by the Secretary of Commerce violates the Appointments Clause and is therefore unconstitutional.
November 24, 2020 at 11:26 AM
8 minute read
Although patent infringement proceedings in the United States often begin as civil actions filed in federal district courts, many of these disputes are ultimately resolved elsewhere. Most commonly, these include administrative trials before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), the tribunal arm of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: For Big Law Names, Shorter is Sweeter
- 2Wine, Dine and Grind (Through the Weekend): Summer Associates Thirst For Experience in 'Real Matters'
- 3'That's Disappointing': Only 11% of MDL Appointments Went to Attorneys of Color in 2023
- 4What We Know About the Kentucky Judge Killed in His Chambers
- 5'I'm Staying Everything': Texas Bankruptcy Judge Halts Talc Trials Against J&J
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250