Are We Heading Toward an Escrow State? Thanks to COVID-19, We Are Already There!
The traditional "brick and mortar" closing has undergone a significant transformation as state mandated guidelines and personal apprehension limit the number of attendees present within the four walls of a closing room.
December 10, 2020 at 10:00 AM
8 minute read
For those of us who have been asked to review that Florida condo purchase on behalf of a relative or close friend, familiarity with "escrow closings" and other out of state settlement procedures is easily recognized. A review of the HUD-1 (or other closing statement) details the debits and credits between the parties (tax adjustments, HOA dues, etc.), the closing costs to be paid by the parties and the funds necessary to close. Depending on lender financing or a cash purchase, upon the completion of all closing formalities, title is transferred to the purchaser and funds disbursed to the seller. Sounds familiar? It should as this is the same outcome from a traditional "brick and mortar" closing where all parties are present throughout the closing.
Fast forward to our COVID pandemic environment. The traditional "brick and mortar" closing has undergone a significant transformation as state mandated guidelines and personal apprehension limit the number of attendees present within the four walls of a closing room. Changes to facilitate the traditional closing are being legislated and implemented. What impact this will have on the traditional closing attorney's role and the value of services rendered has yet to be measured, but one thing is for sure, escrow closings are here to stay. The traditional closing attorney needs to embrace the "escrow closing" concept and drive the narrative while adapting his/her role. As much as our profession has tried to avoid this scenario by maintaining a critical role in the closing process, the handwriting is on the "closing wall," if not already there (and in BOLD print).
As urban dwellers exit to the perceived safer confines of the suburban counties, the residential real estate market has experienced a surge of activity fueled in part by the pandemic and historically low mortgage rates. Conducting business as usual, during the pandemic, amongst the mortgage, title, brokerage and legal professions in response to this surge of activity has highlighted the "escrow closing" as a viable alternative to the traditional closing. For the real estate attorney, does this mean less involvement in the closing and consequently a lesser fee for services rendered? Not necessarily. While attendance at a closing may no longer be required, the work to be performed and the added legalities of an "escrow closing" can preserve and enhance the role of the real estate attorney.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTortious Interference With a Contract; Retaliatory Eviction Defense; Illegal Lockout: This Week in Scott Mollen’s Realty Law Digest
Court of Appeals Provides Comfort to Land Use Litigants Through the Relation Back Doctrine
8 minute readPiercing the Corporate Veil; City’s Authority To Order Restorations; Standing: This Week in Scott Mollen’s Realty Law Digest
Trending Stories
- 1Law Firms Report Wide Growth, Successful Billing Rate Increases and Less Merger Interest
- 2CLOs Face Mounting Pressure as Risks Mushroom and Job Duties Expand
- 3X Faces Intense Scrutiny as EU Investigation Races to Conclusion & Looming Court Battle
- 4'Nation Is in Trouble': NY Lawmakers Advance Bill to Set Parameters for Shielding Juror IDs in Criminal Matters
- 5Margolis Edelstein Broadens Leadership With New Co-Managing Partner
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250