Are We Heading Toward an Escrow State? Thanks to COVID-19, We Are Already There!
The traditional "brick and mortar" closing has undergone a significant transformation as state mandated guidelines and personal apprehension limit the number of attendees present within the four walls of a closing room.
December 10, 2020 at 10:00 AM
8 minute read
For those of us who have been asked to review that Florida condo purchase on behalf of a relative or close friend, familiarity with "escrow closings" and other out of state settlement procedures is easily recognized. A review of the HUD-1 (or other closing statement) details the debits and credits between the parties (tax adjustments, HOA dues, etc.), the closing costs to be paid by the parties and the funds necessary to close. Depending on lender financing or a cash purchase, upon the completion of all closing formalities, title is transferred to the purchaser and funds disbursed to the seller. Sounds familiar? It should as this is the same outcome from a traditional "brick and mortar" closing where all parties are present throughout the closing.
Fast forward to our COVID pandemic environment. The traditional "brick and mortar" closing has undergone a significant transformation as state mandated guidelines and personal apprehension limit the number of attendees present within the four walls of a closing room. Changes to facilitate the traditional closing are being legislated and implemented. What impact this will have on the traditional closing attorney's role and the value of services rendered has yet to be measured, but one thing is for sure, escrow closings are here to stay. The traditional closing attorney needs to embrace the "escrow closing" concept and drive the narrative while adapting his/her role. As much as our profession has tried to avoid this scenario by maintaining a critical role in the closing process, the handwriting is on the "closing wall," if not already there (and in BOLD print).
As urban dwellers exit to the perceived safer confines of the suburban counties, the residential real estate market has experienced a surge of activity fueled in part by the pandemic and historically low mortgage rates. Conducting business as usual, during the pandemic, amongst the mortgage, title, brokerage and legal professions in response to this surge of activity has highlighted the "escrow closing" as a viable alternative to the traditional closing. For the real estate attorney, does this mean less involvement in the closing and consequently a lesser fee for services rendered? Not necessarily. While attendance at a closing may no longer be required, the work to be performed and the added legalities of an "escrow closing" can preserve and enhance the role of the real estate attorney.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDeposing Former Mayor Bill de Blasio; Misrepresentations To Induce Investment: This Week in Scott Mollen’s Realty Law Digest
Doctrine of ‘Practical Location,’ Breach of a Commercial Lease: This Week in Scott Mollen’s Realty Law Digest
US Supreme Court Justices Pass on Landlord Challenge to NY Rent Stabilization
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250