This decision involved the “propriety of a liquidated damages provision” (damage provision) in a landlord-tenant “surrender agreement” (agreement). The New York Court of Appeals held that the agreement is “an unenforceable penalty in contravention of public policy.”
The plaintiff landlord and the defendant supermarket tenant had entered into a 15-year lease. In year 13 of the lease period, the tenant facing “financial difficulties,” entered into the agreement that “terminated the lease in exchange for (tenant’s) surrender of the premises and a staggered payment of $261,751.73.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]