SLATs: The Hot New Estate Planning Technique for 2021
The present global circumstances of economic and political uncertainty, a high federal estate tax exemption, and a low-interest rate environment merit a focused examination of whether a SLAT or another irrevocable trust structure can help clients meet many of their objectives.
January 22, 2021 at 02:00 PM
12 minute read
Like the retail industry and memes, estate planning and trust techniques tend to trend in cycles depending on existing federal and state tax laws, fluctuations in interest rates and investments, and a touch of crystal-ball predictions about future changes to both given the political climate of the day. Estate planning acronyms tend to ride these trends and SLAT is the acronym of the moment. In short, the SLAT allows a client concerned about estate taxes to "gift" up to the maximum allowable amount into an irrevocable trust while still maintaining access to the benefit of the gifted assets through one's spouse.
SLAT stands for Spousal Life Access Trust. A SLAT is a shorthand reference for trusts for spouses created and funded during one's lifetime (as opposed to funded at the death of the first spouse). Although a SLAT is an irrevocable trust, the benefit of a properly drafted SLAT is that the funds are out of both spouses' estates—thus avoiding estate tax on assets in the SLAT—but allows control and access to the funds held by the SLAT trust until the death of the surviving spouse (the second spouse to die). The beneficiary spouse can still access distributions of income or principal from the transferred assets if needed and if permitted by the SLAT. The SLAT can also allow the trustee to make loans of trust assets to the grantor spouse, to be paid back by the estate at death.
When properly drafted and maintained, this is an appealing method to "lock in" the current exemption amount without fully relinquishing access to assets gifted to the SLAT. This has become a particularly appealing and advantageous technique for married couples with potentially taxable estates because the current high-exemption environment is the highest and most favorable it has ever been historically. Under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Acts of 2017 (the TCJA), in 2021, the federal gift and estate tax exemption will be $11.7 million per person, or $23.4 million between a married couple using "portability" (the unused portion of a deceased spouse's exemption). Absent new legislation, on Jan. 1, 2026, the exemption will revert to the pre-TCJA exemption ($5 million) adjusted for inflation. Should the exemption revert, taxpayers who take advantage of the increased TCJA exemption will not be adversely affected and there will not be a claw back of the exemption. Treas. Reg. §20.2010-1(c).
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250