Examining the Biden Administration's Antitrust Priorities
As the Biden administration sets its antitrust policy agenda, will their choices have a transformative effect on antitrust policy—or just continue the status quo? Karen Hoffman Lent and Kenneth Schwartz explore the issue in this edition of their Antitrust Trade and Practice column.
February 08, 2021 at 12:15 PM
11 minute read
A new presidential administration necessarily ushers in a change in leadership and presents the possibility of a different antitrust regime. Yet these new appointees must still grapple with the vestiges of the old guard. The administration of newly elected President Joe Biden has inherited large, ongoing antitrust investigations along with mounting bi-partisan pressures to consider sweeping changes to antitrust law. Though both President Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris have voiced their support for stricter antitrust measures, they have not concretely defined their antitrust priorities since taking office. They also have not yet nominated individuals to key leadership positions in the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (DOJ) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). As the Biden administration sets its antitrust policy agenda, will their choices have a transformative effect on antitrust policy—or just continue the status quo?
Historically, one would expect antitrust enforcement to throttle up under a Democratic administration. Progressive antitrust policies are viewed as less accepting of synergies and efficiencies arguments and on more heightened alert for potential losses in consumer welfare versus pure competition concerns. As the past four years under Republican leadership demonstrate, however, antitrust enforcement on the whole is on a new footing. The outgoing administration made antitrust enforcement, particularly on large technology players and transactions involving killer acquisitions, a defining feature. Against the backdrop of high-profile investigations and enforcement actions, there have been seemingly incessant calls to expand antitrust law's purview. Even outgoing Assistant Attorney General (AAG) Makan Delrahim devoted his final address as AAG to consider specific antitrust policy changes, including establishing a specialized antitrust court and implementing a presumption that, for firms with more than 50 percent market share in a certain market, further acquisitions in that market are anticompetitive. See U.S. Department of Justice, Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim Delivers Final Address (Jan. 19, 2021). Recently appointed Acting FTC Chair Rebecca Slaughter noted that she agreed with almost all of the ideas former AAG Delrahim promoted in his final address, further highlighting the overwhelming bi-partisan support for potential sweeping changes to the current antitrust regime. See Curtis Eichelberger, Acting FTC Chair Slaughter Says Agency Should Consider Whether Decisions to Add Structural Inequities, MLex (Jan. 26, 2021).
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSkadden and Steptoe, Defending Amex GBT, Blasts Biden DOJ's Antitrust Lawsuit Over Merger Proposal
4 minute readRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readAfter Solving Problems for Presidents, Ron Klain Now Applying Legal Prowess to Helping Airbnb Overturn NYC Ban
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250