Your Choices Are Your Own: Sedona Principle 6 and TAR
Nearly a decade since its rise to prominence, disputes are still occurring over whether and when TAR should be used, and courts are still turning to Sedona Principle 6 to resolve them.
February 08, 2021 at 11:30 AM
7 minute read
In 2020, two new cases featured disputes about the use of technology-assisted review (TAR) approaches to e-discovery: one attempt to compel the use of a TAR approach (In re Mercedes-Benz Emissions Litig. (D.N.J. Jan. 8, 2020)) and one attempt to prevent the use of a TAR approach (Livingston v. City of Chicago (N.D. Ill. Sep. 3, 2020)). In each case, Sedona Principle 6 was cited favorably as embodying the correct approach to such disputes: producing parties are in the best position to pick their own methods. This continues a short line of cases, including Kleen Products (2011), Hyles (2016), and In re Viagra Prods. Liab. Litig. (2016), settling disputes related to the use of TAR approaches in this way.
Sedona Principle 6
Among the 14 principles set forth in The Sedona Principles, Third Edition: Best Practices, Recommendations & Principles for Addressing Electronic Document Production is Principle 6, which addresses the selection of e-discovery methodologies: "Responding parties are best situated to evaluate the procedures, methodologies, and technologies appropriate for preserving and producing their own electronically stored information." The commentary explains that this principle is:
… grounded in reason, common sense, procedural rules, and common law, and is premised on each party fulfilling its discovery obligations without direction from the court or opposing counsel, and eschewing "discovery on discovery," unless a specific deficiency is shown in a party's production.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: For Big Law Names, Shorter is Sweeter
- 2Wine, Dine and Grind (Through the Weekend): Summer Associates Thirst For Experience in 'Real Matters'
- 3'That's Disappointing': Only 11% of MDL Appointments Went to Attorneys of Color in 2023
- 4What We Know About the Kentucky Judge Killed in His Chambers
- 5'I'm Staying Everything': Texas Bankruptcy Judge Halts Talc Trials Against J&J
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250