The Right Formula: Gifts of Difficult-to-Value Assets
While it remains challenging to predict the timing and magnitude of changes to the federal lifetime exemption amount, effective estate planning strategies, including lifetime gifts, can provide substantial tax benefits whether exemptions decrease in the near future or not.
February 19, 2021 at 11:45 AM
8 minute read
Twice within the last 10 years, wealthy taxpayers have felt particular pressure to pare down the sizes of their taxable estates as a result of expected changes in the federal lifetime exemption amount (the amount that a taxpayer can gift or die with without incurring gift or estate tax). In 2012, taxpayers feared that the federal lifetime exemption amount would return to $1 million from $5,120,000, leading to a high level of year-end gift giving in 2012. In early 2013, Congress acted to extend the higher exemption. Now, taxpayers similarly fear that the generous almost $12 million federal lifetime exemption amount ($11.58 million for gifts made or decedents dying in 2020 and $11.7 million for gifts made or decedents dying in 2021) will be reduced (a popular expectation is that it may be reduced by half) as a result of the Democrats' control of the presidency, Senate and House of Representatives. Taxpayers who do not make use of the full federal lifetime exemption amount now fear that they may never have the opportunity to do so again.
Individuals who are flush with cash and marketable securities may find the decision to gift easy: They likely know how much they have gifted in the past and therefore how much remains of their exemption. They can easily match the amount of cash they are giving to their remaining lifetime exemption. Similarly, with marketable securities, the mean between the high and the low on the date of their gift is the amount of the exemption they use. If they want to reach their remaining lifetime exemption exactly, they can make up any difference with cash.
There may be reasons, however, why wealthy individuals may not want to use cash or marketable securities to make gifts. They may not have sufficient liquid assets to gift the full exemption amount and still live in the style to which they are accustomed. Alternatively, or in addition, available valuation discounts for difficult-to-value assets may allow them to leverage their remaining exemption by gifting such assets instead of cash or marketable securities.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250