New York CPLR §3121 permits an opposing party to require a plaintiff to submit to an independent examination by a designated physician. This Independent Medical Examination (IME) serves an important function. “[P]hysical examinations [narrow], if possible, areas of medical dispute through the assistance of the medical profession, and [eliminate] most of the medical controversy in a personal injury case.” Jakubowski v. Lengen, 86 A.D.2d 398, 400 (4th Dept. 1982).

It is an established principle that a plaintiff undergoing an IME is entitled to the presence of a legal representative hired by their attorney. Ponce v. Health Ins. Plan, 100 A.D.2d 963, 964 (2d Dept. 1984). This concept was reinforced in Cioffi v. S.M. Foods where the court stated “[f]or a court to deny plaintiff accompaniment of his choice, an attorney or representative sent by the attorney, is an infringement upon plaintiff’s right to be assisted by counsel.” Cioffi v. S.M. Foods, 2013 NY Slip Op 32579(U) (N.Y. Sup. Aug. 6, 2013).

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]