'MarketShare' Acknowledges Challenge of Distinguishing Consulting, Information Services, and Software
As the world marches into the third decade of widely available electronic resources, distinguishing among consulting services, information services, and the provision of software, and then applying the differing sales tax rules to them, becomes only more difficult. In this edition of their Tax Appeals Tribunal column, Joseph Lipari and Aaron S. Gaynor discuss the recent determination in 'MarketShare Partners', which provides a rich text for those trying to classify a business as fitting into one of these categories.
March 01, 2021 at 12:35 PM
8 minute read
For many years, we have periodically reminded readers of this column of the uncertainties encountered in deciding whether transactions in the "knowledge" industry are subject to New York sales tax, a tax that was originally designed to tax the sales of tangible personal property. Nevertheless, as the world marches into the third decade of widely available electronic resources, distinguishing among consulting services, information services, and the provision of software, and then applying the differing sales tax rules to them, becomes only more difficult. The recent administrative law judge determination in MarketShare Partners, DTA No. 828562 (N.Y. Div. Tax App., Dec. 3, 2020) provides a rich text for those trying to classify a business as fitting into one of these categories.
N.Y. Tax Law §1105(a) generally imposes sales tax on the sale of "tangible personal property," which, under §1101(b)(6), includes "pre-written computer software … regardless of the medium by means of which such software is conveyed … ." Services are subject to sales tax only to the extent set forth in the statute. §§1105(c)(1) and (9) generally impose sales tax on "information services." The law provides an exception in the case of "information which is personal or individual in nature and which is not or may not be substantially incorporated in reports furnished to other persons." Consulting services are not specified as taxable, and, therefore, are not taxable.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllClass Certification, Cash-Sweep Cases Among Securities Litigation Trends to Watch in 2025
6 minute readHealth Care Data Breach Class Actions Saw December Surge in NY Courts
AI Startup Founder Defrauded Investors of Millions, US Prosecutors Say
3 minute readLegal Leaders See AI's Multitude of Uses as Both Blessing and Curse
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250