For many years in New York medical malpractice trials, the error in judgment charge was given as a standard part of the jury charge, incorporated into Pattern Jury Instruction 2:150, the very definition of medical malpractice. The widely accepted concept is that where a physician has exercised professional judgment by selecting one of the alternative courses available within the standard of care, that judgment should be protected from second-guessing in the event that the patient does not obtain the desired outcome.

Every profession has its equivalent of the medical standard of care, and it is up to the professionals to apply their judgment to the best advantage of their patient or client, always within the overall standards. A rough analogy is that in football, the quarterback has many options within his judgment as to how to advance the ball, but will be stopped by the referee if there is a violation of the rules of the game or the boundaries of the field.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]