Why Do We Need the Green Amendment?
New Yorkers do not presently have a right to clean air and water.
March 15, 2021 at 08:48 AM
4 minute read
This fall, New Yorkers will be asked to vote on whether the New York State Constitution should be amended to recognize a "a right to clean air and water, and a healthful environment." I suspect that, for many, this will cause a bit of head scratching. You mean we don't already have a right clean air and water?
No, New Yorkers do not presently have a right to clean air and water. There are many laws aimed at protecting human health and the environment, including laws designed to ensure that our drinking water is safe to drink and that our air is safe to breathe. But, as any resident of Hoosick Falls can tell you, if, for some reason, those laws don't apply or aren't being implemented effectively, citizens may have little recourse.
In the case of Hoosick Falls, a citizen concerned about an unusual number of family and neighbors getting cancer paid to have his drinking water tested, which revealed high levels of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), a suspected carcinogen. Upon reporting the high levels of PFOA in the water to the relevant regulators, the Village of Hoosick Falls was assured by the Rensselaer County Department of Health and New York State Department of Health that Hoosick Falls' drinking water met all relevant standards and was safe to drink, going so far as to advise the Village that it was not necessary to collect more water samples. But here's the catch about PFOAS as well as many other so-called emerging contaminants, like 1, 4 dioxane (also regularly found in drinking water in New York). The laws designed to keep our drinking water safe only limit chemicals in drinking water for which drinking water standards have been established. If a standard hasn't been set (a process that can take decades), the chemical can lawfully remain in our drinking water. And, although serious concerns have been raised for decades about health risks from exposure to PFOA and similar chemicals, no national drinking water standard for it has yet been developed (although New York set its own standard of 10 parts per trillion in August 2020).
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhy Is It Becoming More Difficult for Businesses to Mandate Arbitration of Employment Disputes?
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Everything Leaves a Digital Footprint': How to Navigate the Complexities of Internal Investigations
- 2Baker McKenzie Accepts Defeat on Australian Integration With Firm's Asia Practice
- 3PepsiCo's Legal Team Champions Diversity, Wellness, and Mentorship to Shape a Thriving Corporate Culture
- 4The Dynamic Duo Behind CMG's Legal Ops Team
- 5Land Use Issues Presented By Cold Storage Warehouses
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250