Lifetime 'QTIPable' Trusts for Gift, Estate Tax Exemption Planning
With the change in political control in Washington, what changes are on the horizon and what estate tax planning should be done early in 2021 for those high net worth individuals who have not used all of their available exemption?
March 17, 2021 at 10:30 AM
8 minute read
With the change in political control in Washington, what changes are on the horizon and what estate tax planning should be done early in 2021 for those high net worth individuals who have not used all of their available exemption? The 2017 TCJA doubled the amount of the federal gift and estate tax exemption. For 2021 the exemption is $11.7 million per taxpayer. Absent any sooner change, the 2017 law will "sunset" at the end of 2025 and the exemption will revert back to the pre-2017 level of $5 million (adjusted annually for inflation).
Currently, although the Biden administration tax proposal includes a reduction in the estate tax exemption, it has not prioritized any tax law changes that would reduce the exemption to the pre-2017 level, or even a lower number. Such targeted legislation affecting income and estate and gift tax rates could be passed later this year, at the earliest, and is unlikely to be made retroactive to Jan. 1, 2021. As of this writing, the legislative focus is on a pandemic relief package and other pressing economic issues.
The uncertainty of when the exemption may be reduced makes flexibility in planning techniques very attractive. In this vein, the estate planning options discussed in our 2020 Federal Gift and Estate Tax Planning Alerts last October 2020 (Parts I and II) suggest an additional 2021 planning option for married couples who have available exemption. The basic concept is for one spouse to create and fund a trust for the benefit of the other spouse (a SLAT) for which the decision to treat it as a taxable gift that uses exemption or as a gift protected from tax by the marital deduction can be deferred until October 2022. This can be done using a so-called "QTIPable" trust structured according to the federal tax law and regulations that is eligible to qualify for the marital deduction from gift /estate tax. The word "eligible" is what provides flexibility because the election to determine whether the trust will use the grantor's exemption or not will be made on the grantor's 2021 gift tax return, due (on extension) Oct. 15, 2022.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPreemptive Litigation: A Potential Approach for a Precise Situation
13 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The Quiet Revolution: Private Equity’s Push Into Law Firms
- 2Restoring Trust in the Courts Starts in New York
- 3'Pull Back the Curtain': Ex-NFL Players Seek Discovery in Lawsuit Over League's Disability Plan
- 4Tensions Run High at Final Hearing Before Manhattan Congestion Pricing Takes Effect
- 5Improper Removal to Fed. Court Leads to $100K Bill for Blue Cross Blue Shield
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250