The Governor's LIBOR Legislation: Its Promise and Its Limitations
Even with all that the proposed legislation does to curb litigation and provide legal certainty for the parties to LIBOR-based contracts, economically aggrieved parties may still be financially motivated to sue—sometimes for very large sums of money—and will have legitimate arguments to bring.
March 17, 2021 at 11:50 AM
8 minute read
As widely reported, LIBOR—a benchmark interest rate used worldwide in trillions of dollars worth of investment contracts and other financial instruments—is being phased out and will cease publication in its current form entirely by mid-2023. With some LIBOR tenors terminating as soon as the end of this year, Governor Cuomo's FY 2022 budget proposal includes provisions that address LIBOR's retirement. See FY 2022 New York State Executive Budget, Transportation, Economic Development and Environmental Conservation Article VII Legislation, "Part PP: Discontinuance of LIBOR", at pp. 233-42 (hereinafter Proposed LIBOR Legislation). Similar legislation has been drafted and is being considered by congressional lawmakers at the federal level.
Governor Cuomo's proposed LIBOR legislation was initially drafted by the Alternative Reference Rates Committee (ARRC), a body convened by the Federal Reserve Board and the New York Fed to address the end of LIBOR. In proposing the legislation, ARRC warned that New York courts could soon face "a flood of litigation" arising from LIBOR's discontinuation, given the significant number of LIBOR-based contracts and other financial instruments that are governed by New York law. Alternative Reference Rates Committee, "Proposed Legislative Solution to Minimize Legal Uncertainty and Adverse Economic Impact Associated with LIBOR Transition" (March 6, 2020), p. 7.
Accordingly, ARRC and other major stakeholders welcomed the Governor's proposed legislation. See Keshia Clukey and William Shaw, "Libor Overhaul Gets Boost in Cuomo Bid to Avert Transition Chaos," Bloomberg Law (Jan. 21, 2021). Tom Wipf, Vice Chairman of Institutional Securities at Morgan Stanley and Chairman of the ARRC, touted the legislation as "essential in order to provide legal certainty and minimize the adverse economic impacts for legacy Libor contracts," calling the Governor's decision to include the proposed legislation in his budget plan "notable progress." Id.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSEC Official Hints at More Restraint With Industry Bars, Less With Wells Meetings
4 minute readThe CFPB Is Digging In for Last Days of Biden's Term. But What Happens Next?
6 minute readNY AG James Targets Crypto Fraud Which Allegedly Ensnared Victims With Fake Jobs
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Unit Owners Sued Board For Failure To Maintain Adequate Fire Insurance: This Week In Scott Mollen’s Realty Law Digest
- 2NY Judge Resigns After Avoiding Jury Duty by Telling Court He Couldn't Be Impartial
- 3'Serious Legal Errors'?: Rival League May Appeal Following Dismissal of Soccer Antitrust Case
- 4Longtime Purdue GC Accused of Drunken Driving Hires Big-Name Defense Attorney
- 5Eight Years On, A&O Shearman’s Fuse Legal Tech Incubator Is Still Evolving
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250