Why is it so difficult to prosecute police officers for killing unarmed civilians? Even with powerful video evidence, grand juries usually don’t indict, and trial juries usually don’t convict. Do police officers, because of their status, receive a special kind of informal immunity from these juries, even when the jurors can see with their own eyes the willful and unjustified use of deadly force?

Probably the most famous video—at least until the video depicting Derek Chauvin’s knee locked into George Floyd’s neck—showed seven Los Angeles police officers in 1992 savagely beating Rodney King, and the ensuing five days of the bloody “Watts” riots after the officers were acquitted.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]