Should the Scope of the Safe Harbor for a Constructive Trust Claim Differ Depending on Whether the Claim Is Based on State Law or Foreign Law?
U.S. Bankruptcy Court refuses to dismiss foreign constructive trust claims asserted by BVI liquidators in 'Fairfield Sentry' Chapter 15 cases; defendants seek leave to appeal.
April 07, 2021 at 11:30 AM
7 minute read
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York recently denied motions to dismiss constructive trust claims asserted under the laws of the British Virgin Islands (BVI) even though the claims would have been barred by the "Safe Harbor" under §546(e) of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code had they been asserted under U.S. state law. Fairfield Sentry Ltd. v. Theodoor GGC Amsterdam (In re Fairfield Sentry Ltd.), Ch. 15 Case No. 10-13164 (SMB), Adv. No. 10-03496 (SMB), 2021 WL 771677 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Feb. 23, 2021), denying motion for reconsideration, 2020 WL 7345988 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Dec. 14, 2020). On its face, that result seems anomalous. On March 30, 2021, various defendants in the lawsuit filed motions with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, seeking leave to appeal the Bankruptcy Court's decisions.
Fairfield Sentry is a case pending under Chapter 15 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. The case is ancillary to insolvency proceedings pending in the BVI for Fairfield Sentry Limited and other funds (collectively, the Funds) that had invested with Bernard Madoff's enterprise. While the Funds were operational, shares in the Funds were redeemable. After Madoff's fraudulent scheme was discovered, the Funds ceased making redemption payments, they became the subject of the BVI insolvency proceedings, and liquidators were appointed by the BVI court (the Liquidators). The Liquidators then commenced Chapter 15 cases with the Bankruptcy Court and obtained recognition of the BVI proceedings as "foreign main proceedings."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPiercing the Corporate Veil; City’s Authority To Order Restorations; Standing: This Week in Scott Mollen’s Realty Law Digest
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250