The New York Lawyers' Fund: 39 Years of Client Protection
The chairman and the executive director of the New York Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection reflect on the success and reasons behind this program of rectification.
April 29, 2021 at 10:00 AM
8 minute read
As we attorneys registered in the state of New York approach the breathtaking total of one quarter of a billion dollars of reimbursement to client victims of lawyer theft, we should take a moment to capture the reasons for this unique, privately-funded program of rectification. As is true of most every substantial gather of people, deliberate abuses occur. What distinguishes the legal community, not only here but in every state of the union, is the institutionalization of reimbursement to clients who have been financially victimized by their attorneys. Lawyers should take considerable pride that, unlike any other profession, we collectively walk the walk to minimize client loss.
Every two years all lawyers registered to practice in New York state file with the Office of Court Administration. From each registration fee, $30 are annually directed to the Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection (the fund), which in turn has generated the astronomical sum of $233 million in payouts to law clients who were victimized by a small fraction of thieving attorneys. The fund, which was a creation of the State Legislature in 1981, and overseen by the seven judges of New York's Court of Appeals, uses not one dollar of taxpayer money, nor are we affiliated in any way with the more widely known IOLA program.
Gustavo Luis Vila was a former N.Y.P.D. police lieutenant prior to attending Fordham Law School and was a sole practitioner in Yorktown Heights, Westchester County. As a former officer, Vila solicited police and first responders who wished to submit claims to the 9/11 Victims' Compensation Fund (VCF). Officer F was a 9/11 first responder at Ground Zero who had contracted non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and retained Vila to file a successful compensation claim for $1.03 million. In December 2015, Vila pleaded guilty to one count of third degree grand larceny for misappropriating Officer F's net $823,000 settlement recovery. The Lawyers' Fund was able to reimburse Mr. F the maximum reimbursement available: $400,000.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhy Is It Becoming More Difficult for Businesses to Mandate Arbitration of Employment Disputes?
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1$2.7M Verdict for Whistleblower Exposes Employer to $300M Claim
- 2Phila. Med Mal Lawyers In for Busy Year as Court Adjusts for Filing Boom
- 3Bonus Parade Continues, With Additional Firms Matching Milbank
- 4Contract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
- 5European, US Litigation Funding Experts Look for Commonalities at NYU Event
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250