Counsel who practice in the area of litigated divorce acknowledge that one of the early issues to be decided is which party will have pendente lite exclusive use and occupancy of the marital residence. If the parties are unable to come to an agreement concerning that issue, a motion and hearing eventuates, leading to the decision on exclusive use and occupancy being made by the court. If the request for exclusive use and occupancy is not granted, both parties may remain in the marital residence, which is likely emotionally difficult. As discussed below, an arrangement known as the sleep divorce may provide helpful temporary relief.
The criteria for deciding which party will have exclusive use and occupancy of the marital residence has evolved over time. Monroe County Supreme Court Judge Dollinger, in the case of L.M.L v. H.T.N, 57 Misc.3d 1207(A), 68 N.Y.S.3D 379, (Table), 2017 WL 4507541, provided a thorough chronology of the exclusive use and occupancy evolution. Dollinger related that DRL §234, which gives the court discretion in determining exclusive use and occupancy, was derived from §1164-a of the former Civil Practice Act.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
