Insecurity: Unregulated IOT and the Verkada Data Breach
If the unregulated, unsecured nature of many IoT devices remains industry standard practice, it is a near guarantee that breaches like the Verkada breach will become even more frequent, and likely more severe than they already are.
May 07, 2021 at 02:30 PM
8 minute read
A virtually invisible phenomenon. Billions of devices and trillions of dollars. Zero regulation and non-existent security protocols. No, we are not talking about the next pandemic. Recently, the Internet of Things, or "IoT" for short, has been stealing headlines. Unfortunately, these headlines do not often showcase new and innovative product lines. Rather, they focus on the significant uptick of data breaches, DDOS attacks, and cybercrime perpetrated through vulnerable IoT devices.
|Unregulated IoT
The problem is simple: IoT is largely unregulated—and unregulated at every touch point. There are virtually no security standards, virtually no manufacturing standards or industry requirements, and virtually no privacy or legal guidelines. Yet, these unregulated IoT devices are ubiquitous. Surveillance cameras, connected home devices, fitness trackers and other wearables, connected work devices, connected medical devices, smart speakers, and connected vehicles are just a few of the numerous IoT device categories that give way to tens of billions of devices sold and used globally. This number is projected to top 30 billion devices by 2025, with total end user spend reaching 1.6 trillion dollars.
|How Did We Get Here?
The reasoning behind this lack of security and privacy protection is multifaceted. First, most IoT devices are designed to deliver the maximum functionality at a bargain basement price. It is difficult to include security, privacy, and regulatory compliance into the reasonable price of a lightbulb. Second, most IoT devices are designed to be long lasting and essentially maintenance free. As a result, manufacturers have failed to focus on upgradeability, with many products receiving few, if any, security updates or patches. Often, users of these devices are not told to, and may not think to, change the default security settings, leaving their devices vulnerable to those who know or can guess default usernames and passwords. Even if the end user is savvy enough to attempt to change the default settings, those very settings are usually buried within a complex series of menus that are difficult to access. Third, many IoT devices come from suspect lineage, manufactured in countries with even fewer regulations by parties with potentially dubious motivations and suspect data practices. What results from this widespread security failure are frequent data breaches that have the potential to reveal intimate details about users' personal and work lives.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 2Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 3'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 4Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
- 5As a New Year Dawns, the Value of Florida’s Revised Mediation Laws Comes Into Greater Focus
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250