Tortious Interference Case Highlights Statute of Limitations Challenge
In 'S.A.R.L. Galerie Enrico Navarra v. Marlborough Gallery', the First Department agreed with the Supreme Court that plaintiff's claims for tortious interference with contract and aiding and abetting tortious interference with contract had not expired as a matter of law, because all of the elements of the claims had materialized before the statute of limitations had run its course.
May 11, 2021 at 11:10 AM
7 minute read
When does the statute of limitations start to run on a tortious interference with contract claim when the breach occurred somewhere on a spectrum of increasingly breach-like behavior? The Appellate Division, First Department, tackled that question in a May 6 decision concerning a long-running dispute involving the work of world-renowned Chinese-French artist Chu Teh-Chun. In S.A.R.L. Galerie Enrico Navarra v. Marlborough Gallery, the First Department agreed with the Supreme Court that plaintiff's claims for tortious interference with contract and aiding and abetting tortious interference with contract had not expired as a matter of law, because all of the elements of the claims had materialized before the statute of limitations had run its course. The case highlights the challenges of determining when a breach of contract occurred, and the tension between statutes of limitations and the rights of an injured party to bring a claim.
Background
The facts underlying this case go back to 2003, when the plaintiff, Galerie Enrico Navarra (Navarra), contracted with a non-party, the now dead abstract artist Chu Teh-Chun (Chu). Under their agreement, Chu would design 24 ceramic plates, and Navarra would support Chu by, among other things, paying for the production of the plates, helping to promote the sale of the plates, and, ultimately, selling the plates.
Allegedly because of tortious interference by the defendant, Marlborough Gallery (Marlborough), the relationship between Navarra and Chu soured over the next few years, and in February 2007 Chu first sent a cease-and-desist letter to Navarra claiming that the gallery had breached their agreement. Then, two months later, Chu sued Navarra on the same grounds in France. In May 2008, Chu took additional action against Navarra, first by sending a letter to Christie's in Hong Kong, casting doubt on the authenticity of plates that Navarra had arranged to be auctioned there, and demanding that Christie's withdraw the plates from auction. Then, in October 2008, an advertisement appeared in a French art magazine announcing that the plates that Navarra was offering for sale were not authentic.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe 'Bad Actor Syndrome' in Matrimonial and Family Law: The Misbehaving Spouse or Parent
23 minute readHope and Healing: New York's Adult Survivors Act, NYC's Protection Law and Battered Woman Syndrome
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'I'm Staying Everything': Texas Bankruptcy Judge Halts Talc Trials Against J&J
- 2What We Know About the Kentucky Judge Killed in His Chambers
- 3Ex-Prosecutor and Judge Fatally Shot During Attempted Arrest on Federal Corruption Charges
- 4Judge Blasts Authors' Lawyers in Key AI Suit, Says Case Doomed Without Upgraded Team
- 5Federal Judge Won't Stop Title IX Investigation Into Former GMU Law Professor
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholders Christina M. Carroll and A. Michael Pratt have entered appearances for the Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and Securities, Wendy Spicher in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The case, filed Aug. 13 in Texas Northern District Court by Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders; Ashcroft Sutton Reyes; and Locke Lord on behalf of TMX Finance Corporate Services, seeks to challenge the secretary’s ongoing attempt to regulate commercial lending activity outside the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The suit furthers contends that the secretary issued an investigative subpoena to TMX for potential violations of the Pennsylvania Loan Interest and Protection Law and the Consumer Discount Company Act despite TMX's business activities not being governed by such. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge David C. Godbey, is 3:24-cv-02054, TMX Finance Corporate Services Inc v. Spicher.
Who Got The Work
Joseph J. Mueller and Rachel Bier of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have entered appearances for Omachron Alpha, Omachron Intellectual Property and SharkNinja Operating in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The action, filed Sept. 16 in Massachusetts District Court by Kirkland & Ellis, asserts three patents in connection with SharkNinja's sale of the 'Vertex' and 'Stratos' cordless vacuum cleaners. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Allison D. Burroughs, is 1:24-cv-12373, Dyson, Inc. et al v. SharkNinja, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Shloime Fellig of Latham & Watkins has entered an appearance for Ardelyx the company's CEO and CFO in a pending securities class action related to Xphozah, a drug which treats kidney disease and end-stage renal disease. The complaint, filed Aug. 16 in Massachusetts District Court by Pomerantz LLP, contends that the defendants failed to disclose that the company would not be seeking the drug’s acceptance into the Transitional Drug Add-on Payment Adjustment, a bundled payment system regulated by the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Leo T. Sorokin, is 1:24-cv-12119, Yarborough v. Ardelyx, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Alexander P. Ott, Megan Corrigan and Karen Gover of McDermott Will & Emery have entered appearances for Analog Devices, a Massachusetts-based manufacturer of semiconductor processing equipment, in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, which asserts two patents, was filed July 9 in Massachusetts District Court by Arrowood LLP and the Devlin Law Firm on behalf of Ocean Semiconductors. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Patti B. Saris, is 1:24-cv-11759, Ocean Semiconductors LLC v. Analog Devices Inc.
Who Got The Work
Forrest M. 'Teo' Seger of Clark Hill has entered an appearance for Equifax Information Services in a pending lawsuit for claims under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. The case was filed Aug. 13 in Texas Western District Court by Halvorsen Klote on behalf of Quinton Humphrey. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Fred Biery, is 5:24-cv-00892, Humphrey v. LVNV Funding, LLC et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250