Some New York courts have begun routinely tolling prejudgment mortgage interest as a sanction against mortgage lenders and servicers for perceived delays in the foreclosure process. Exercising their “equitable powers,” courts have canceled prejudgment interest as a penalty for delays resulting from, among other things, failing to comply with discovery deadlines or a failure of proof on summary judgment. Close scrutiny reveals that New York courts do not have the power to toll prejudgment interest as a sanction.
This power is predicated on decisions of New York’s intermediate appellate courts, interpreting New York Civil Practice Law & Rules (CPLR) 5001(a) as allowing only a discretionary award of prejudgment interest in “an action of an equitable nature.” This application, however, misunderstands foreclosure actions by conflating the underlying claim at law (breach of contract) with the equitable remedy (foreclosure). When viewed in its proper context, tolling prejudgment interest is contrary to the plain language of CPLR 5001(a), legislative intent and Court of Appeals precedent.
Legislative History of CPLR 5001(a)
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]