With Masks Required, NY Courts Back to Full In-Person Staffing
The return comes more than 15 months after the state court system shut down all "nonessential" services in a pitch to slow New York's nascent coronavirus crisis. Since March of last year, there have been more than 2 million confirmed infections across the state.
May 24, 2021 at 06:25 PM
3 minute read
New York's court system returned to full in-person staffing on Monday as all judges and court staff were ordered to physically report for work. The return comes more than 15 months after the state court system shut down all "nonessential" services in a pitch to slow New York's nascent coronavirus crisis. Since March of last year, there have been more than 2 million confirmed infections across the state. "We have traveled a long, remarkable journey together. We have sadly suffered the losses of family members, friends and colleagues," said Chief Judge Janet DiFiore in a video statement released Monday. "We've worked together to transform and reinvent ourselves as a virtual court system nearly overnight." New York's top judge commented that attorneys and litigants have been waiting for full staffing to come back. "We all know—and we all understand and appreciate—that most court proceedings, for reasons including access to justice or court operations, are most appropriately heard in person," she said. "And our efforts to once again provide a full range of court services to lawyers and their clients and to unrepresented litigants is absolutely the right thing to do. And this is the right time to do it." Remarks like that underscore a mainstay of New York's pre-pandemic legal system: person-to-person interactions. Those connections kept the wheels turning inside state courthouses before the pandemic. But with the coronavirus spreading on a person-to-person basis, that dynamic created obstinate challenges for the court system. Despite the return of full in-person staffing, DiFiore cautioned that the system was not going back to pre-pandemic "business as usual." Court officials will limit the number of individuals in facilities by relying on virtual technology, she said. They will also limit the number of people through a staggered scheduling of court calendars and court appearances. Coronavirus safety protocols aren't going anywhere, either. Courthouse visitors, staff members and judges will continue to be required to wear masks in courthouses, regardless of their vaccination status. The system will also continue with temperature checks, social distancing, sanitizing and coronavirus screenings. The return to the courthouse hasn't been without some controversy. After DiFiore announced the return date last month, several unions said they were left with concerns and unanswered questions. New York's court system is not doing away with its mask requirement for now, even though the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has given the OK for fully vaccinated people to stop wearing face masks in most public indoor situations. DiFiore says they're keeping the mask requirement for the time being. "We are doing so out of an abundance of caution and in order to carefully monitor and evaluate the impact of increased traffic in our courthouses following today's return to full staffing levels," DiFiore said in the video statement. She says they'll reconsider that decision when they have more experience and data.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSo Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readHochul Vetoes 'Grieving Families' Bill, Faulting a Lack of Changes to Suit Her Concerns
Court System Names New Administrative Judges for New York City Courts in Leadership Shakeup
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Uber Cannot Be Held Vicariously Liable for Driver's Alleged Negligent Conduct
- 2TikTok Law and TikTok Politics
- 3California Supreme Court Vacates Murder Conviction in Infant Abuse Case
- 4New York’s Proposed Legislation Restraining Transfer of Real Property
- 5Withers Hires Lawyers, Staff From LA Trusts and Estates Boutique
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250