A defendant landlord (landlord) moved for summary judgment regarding two causes of action. The defendant also sought an order that a Feb. 1, 2017 lease modification effectively modified the October 2012 lease between the defendant and a prior tenant.
The plaintiff had entered into a sublease with sublessors “A” and “B,” representatives of the defendant “C.” The sublease had followed a September 2016 “asset sale” agreement between defendant “C” and the plaintiffs. Pursuant to the sublease, the plaintiff obtained an option to purchase the property and that option had allegedly been a “key component” of the lease between “A,” “B,” and the landlord. The plaintiff thereafter paid monthly rent payments to the landlord.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]