When the Client's Rights Depend on a Clerk's Office, Trust But Verify
Though practitioners may understandably believe that they can rely on receipts from the clerk's office or a filing service as proof that the client's lien was perfected, this may not be sufficient if the clerk's office makes an error.
June 04, 2021 at 02:10 PM
10 minute read
One of the basic tenets of representing a creditor is taking any steps available to establish and maintain the creditor's priority over the debtor's other creditors. Doing this often requires filing documents with clerks or government offices to notify third parties of the creditor's interest. For example, a money judgment becomes a perfected lien on any New York real property owned by a judgment debtor only if the judgment is "docketed" with the clerk in the county where the real property is located. Though practitioners may understandably believe that they can rely on receipts from the clerk's office or a filing service as proof that the client's lien was perfected, this may not be sufficient if the clerk's office makes an error. Therefore, when filings are critical to establishing a client's priority, practitioners should conduct a search to confirm that those filings are properly included in the public record and effective.
The consequences of skipping a confirmatory search were illustrated by Pereira v. 397 Realty LLC (In re Heavey), 549 B.R. 1 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 2016), in which the court allowed a bankruptcy trustee to avoid a judgment lien because of an apparent error made by the county clerk. The court ruled against the judgment creditor notwithstanding the creditor's timely delivery of a filing to the clerk that, if docketed correctly, would have insulated the lien from attack.
The key facts of Heavey began in March 2004, when the New York Supreme Court, New York County, rendered a $1,165,704.11 judgment against Mr. Heavey (the judgment debtor) and others. The New York County Clerk entered and docketed the judgment and filed the "judgment-roll," which is a compilation of certain case documents. The judgment creditor also had the judgment docketed in Kings County because the judgment debtor co-owned multifamily real estate in Park Slope, Brooklyn. Under New York law, this docketing creates a lien in favor of the judgment creditor on any real property that the judgment debtor owns or subsequently acquires in that county. See CPLR §5203(a). Once the lien is perfected, it remains enforceable for a period of 10 years measured from the date that the county clerk who entered the judgment files the judgment-roll. Id. And under certain circumstances, a judgment lien may be extended by court order. Id. §5203(b).
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250