When the Client's Rights Depend on a Clerk's Office, Trust But Verify
Though practitioners may understandably believe that they can rely on receipts from the clerk's office or a filing service as proof that the client's lien was perfected, this may not be sufficient if the clerk's office makes an error.
June 04, 2021 at 02:10 PM
10 minute read
One of the basic tenets of representing a creditor is taking any steps available to establish and maintain the creditor's priority over the debtor's other creditors. Doing this often requires filing documents with clerks or government offices to notify third parties of the creditor's interest. For example, a money judgment becomes a perfected lien on any New York real property owned by a judgment debtor only if the judgment is "docketed" with the clerk in the county where the real property is located. Though practitioners may understandably believe that they can rely on receipts from the clerk's office or a filing service as proof that the client's lien was perfected, this may not be sufficient if the clerk's office makes an error. Therefore, when filings are critical to establishing a client's priority, practitioners should conduct a search to confirm that those filings are properly included in the public record and effective.
The consequences of skipping a confirmatory search were illustrated by Pereira v. 397 Realty LLC (In re Heavey), 549 B.R. 1 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 2016), in which the court allowed a bankruptcy trustee to avoid a judgment lien because of an apparent error made by the county clerk. The court ruled against the judgment creditor notwithstanding the creditor's timely delivery of a filing to the clerk that, if docketed correctly, would have insulated the lien from attack.
The key facts of Heavey began in March 2004, when the New York Supreme Court, New York County, rendered a $1,165,704.11 judgment against Mr. Heavey (the judgment debtor) and others. The New York County Clerk entered and docketed the judgment and filed the "judgment-roll," which is a compilation of certain case documents. The judgment creditor also had the judgment docketed in Kings County because the judgment debtor co-owned multifamily real estate in Park Slope, Brooklyn. Under New York law, this docketing creates a lien in favor of the judgment creditor on any real property that the judgment debtor owns or subsequently acquires in that county. See CPLR §5203(a). Once the lien is perfected, it remains enforceable for a period of 10 years measured from the date that the county clerk who entered the judgment files the judgment-roll. Id. And under certain circumstances, a judgment lien may be extended by court order. Id. §5203(b).
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250