Some might have titled this essay differently. They might call it, “May Judges Use Their Robes To Make Things Right?” Wouldn’t the world, after all, some would argue, be a better place if a “society’s ombudsman” of sorts dressed in black robes—could determine every case’s outcome in Voltairian “best of all possible worlds” terms? Judges capable of truly looking at cases from both sides who somehow could always undo wrongs that needed to be righted.

“Knight-errant”! A term brought to the fore by the greatest common law judge in American history, Benjamin N. Cardozo. As he, seemingly opposed to this hypothetical Voltairian judge, oh-so-poetically, put it: A judge “is not a knight-errant, roaming at will in pursuit of his [or her] own ideal of beauty or goodness.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]