The Post-Pandemic World of Office
While displacement of the workforce was widely embraced on a temporary basis, employees and employers must consider whether to make the work from home model a permanent workstyle, and if so, how.
June 18, 2021 at 02:30 PM
12 minute read
An increase in work from home is here to stay. A year prior to the pandemic, commutes were at an all-time high, with the average American commute growing to just over 27 minutes one way in 2018. See Christopher Ingraham, "Nine days on the road. Average commute time reached a new record last year," The Washington Post (Oct. 7, 2019). In New York City, the average commute time was at 43 minutes by car and 53 minutes by transit (see "NYC has longest commute time via car and transit, study says," Metro Magazine (April 25, 2019) and while traffic is known to be an issue in Los Angeles, it also attracts the most super commuters, and more than 150,000 "super" commuters have drive times averaging 90 minutes each way (see Elijah Chiland, "Number of LA residents dealing with commute times over 90 minutes surges," Curbed Los Angeles (Aug. 15, 2019)). Work from home was far from an accepted norm, but rather a model growing in popularity and desirability and allowing for greater flexibility in when and how work was performed. The requirements of the pandemic have accelerated and increased the transition to this model of professional work/life.
Pandemic-induced lockdowns forced office workers to adjust their home lives to accommodate their work responsibilities, while both employees and employers have faced difficult choices and newly imposed requirements for how space and time are used. The pandemic provided, among other things, an opportunity for office workers to reassess their home spaces and break from their every-day routines by adding or using additional spaces (indoor and outdoor) at home. As a result of the stay-at-home orders, some people who had the flexibility to work remotely (see Cynthia Paez Bowman, "Coronavirus Moving Study: People Left Big Cities, Temporary Moves Spiked in First 6 Months of COVID-19 Pandemic," MyMove (June 1, 2021)) moved further away from urban centers toward the suburbs and rural settings or within the same metro area as part of an urban shuffle to accommodate space requirements (see Marie Patino, Aaron Kessler and Sarah Holder, "More Americans Are Leaving Cities, But Don't Call It an Urban Exodus," Bloomberg (April 26, 2021)). Needless to say, these shifts in geography offer more tailored and affordable living options than their urban counterparts.
While displacement of the workforce was widely embraced on a temporary basis, employees and employers must consider whether to make the work from home model a permanent workstyle, and if so, how. A biproduct of migration to less densely populated areas is that the even greater potential commute times resulting from that migration is likely to fuel the demand to continue to work from home, and this will need to be addressed. The demand for office space will be changed in the post-pandemic world; there is shift from the previous paradigm—in which the majority of employees were expected to be in and work from the office full-time—to a new reality that those who have been able to work from home will expect greater flexibility in the requirements to be in the office, which will lead to changes in the need for and draw to the office. See Dina Gerdeman, "COVID Killed the Traditional Workplace. What Should Companies Do Now?" Harvard Business School (March 8, 2021). Our impending shift back toward to in person/office work poses a unique question and challenge for commercial office space tenants and landlords: what is the purpose of our office spaces in a post-pandemic world and how can we use our space to meet the needs of our tenants or employees?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPiercing the Corporate Veil; City’s Authority To Order Restorations; Standing: This Week in Scott Mollen’s Realty Law Digest
After Solving Problems for Presidents, Ron Klain Now Applying Legal Prowess to Helping Airbnb Overturn NYC Ban
7 minute readThis Week in Scott Mollen’s Realty Law Digest: Constructive Trust Claim; Succession Rights; Tenant ‘Blacklisting Law’
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Cravath Hires Paul Weiss Antitrust Co-Chair
- 2Contract Technology Provider LegalOn Launches AI-powered Playbook Tool
- 3Court of Appeals Provides Comfort to Land Use Litigants Through the Relation Back Doctrine
- 4Amid the Tragedy of the L.A. Fires, a Lesson on the Value of Good Neighbors
- 5Democracy in Focus: New York State Court of Appeals Year in Review
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250