Cybersecurity Enforcement Trends: A Fraught New Reality for 'Victims' of Cyberattacks
Recently, there have been signs of a different approach to cybersecurity enforcement, as regulators have shifted their focus from data breach notifications to overall cybersecurity preparedness.
June 25, 2021 at 02:30 PM
8 minute read
Cybersecurity is a critical area of concern for every business. Most businesses have, by this time, been victimized by a cyberattack or an attempted attack. Given this, as well as the dramatic increase in the overall number of reported cyberattacks, businesses have been forced to reckon with the significant financial, legal, and reputational consequences of such attacks. Recent high-profile attacks—like those involving Solar Winds and Colonial Pipeline—have only highlighted the need for concern about protecting against malicious cyber actors.
Businesses are right to be concerned. Cyberattacks have serious consequences. For one, the costs associated with defending against and responding to attacks are significant—particularly for companies that do not have adequate cyber insurance coverage. Remediation costs can be especially burdensome, and, in many cases, will total millions of dollars. On top of this, there are significant costs associated with disruption to normal business operations, which, in some cases, are greater than the remediation costs. There are also significant reputational costs associated with being victimized by a cyberattack. In the event that the attack becomes public, businesses are often the subject of unfavorable media attention, and there is a risk of losing the business of customers, clients, and partners who fear for their own information, data, and reputation.
Of course, there are also significant legal costs associated with cyberattacks. Victims are frequently sued by individuals or entities whose personal or sensitive information was affected by the attack. While the legal merits of such lawsuits are debatable and the outcomes are variable, defending against these cases is expensive and resource intensive.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250