Realty Law Digest
Scott E. Mollen, a partner at Herrick, Feinstein, discusses two landlord-tenant cases: "Mall 1-Bay Plaza v. Bronx Vistasite Eyecare," where temporary closures under executive orders did not constitute a taking of tenant's business, and "Bronx Park Phase II Preserv v. V.C." where the court granted tenant's motion to hold a holdover eviction proceeding via virtual trial.
June 29, 2021 at 11:47 AM
18 minute read
Commercial Landlord-Tenant—Pandemic and Governor's Executive Orders Did Not Provide Basis To Invoke Doctrines of Frustration of Purpose, Impossibility and Lack of Consideration and Did Not Constitute a "Taking"
A plaintiff landlord alleged that the commercial tenant had failed to pay rent from April 1, 2020 through the present. The landlord asserted that it is owed $162,905.65 for rent, water charges, utilities and other charges.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250