Photo: Shutterstock NYSBA Gives Lawyers Green Light to Counsel and Partake in Recreational Marijuana Market
Opinion 1225 provides welcome guidance not only to attorneys practicing within the state, but also to a burgeoning industry looking for legal guidance in navigating the rigorous regulatory minefields that come with state level legalization of marijuana.
August 02, 2021 at 11:25 AM
8 minute read
In March, Gov. Andrew Cuomo signed the Marijuana Regulation and Tax Act (MRTA) into law. MRTA, among other things, legalized the use of recreational marijuana for adults aged 21 and over. Moreover, MRTA outlined a broad regulatory structure through which recreational marijuana will be cultivated, distributed, sold, and consumed. MRTA also permits individuals to grow cannabis plants at home, subject to certain regulations and limitations. Since marijuana remains illegal under federal narcotics law (see Controlled Substance Act, 21 U.S.C. 812), large questions loomed for New York attorneys as to whether they could provide legal services to the wide-range of clients that are already (or plan to be) engaged in activities authorized by MRTA and/or for attorneys to otherwise engage in conduct permitted under MRTA, which would be illegal under federal law.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
How Businesses Can Protect Themselves Given the Influx Nature of Non-Competes
6 minute read
FOIA Claims Dismissed Based on Res Judicata, New Trial Granted and Qui Tam Claims
8 minute read
Latham, Kirkland Alums Land the Top GC Posts—Here's What It Means for Business Generation
10 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The Pennsylvania Superior Court and the Wrong Business
- 2On the Move and After Hours: Cole Schotz; Genova Burns; Sarno da Costa; Scarinci Hollenbeck
- 3IRE Physicians Must Consider All Conditions 'Due to' a Work Injury
- 4Social Media Policy for Judges Provides Guidance in a Changing World
- 5Demonizing Haitian Immigrants: Welcome to the Club
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
