Realty Law Digest
In this edition of his Realty Law Digest, Scott Mollen discusses "B&A Realty Mgt., LLC v. Gloria," "Cozzolino v. N.Y.S. Div. of Hous. & Cmty. Renewal," and "Daytree at Courtland Square Inc. v. Walsh."
August 10, 2021 at 01:59 PM
18 minute read
Scott Mollen, Partner at Herrick, Feinstein LLP
Contracts—Specific Performance Denied—Contract Subject to Land Use Approvals—After Expiration of Time Period For Obtaining the Approvals, Seller Had Right To Cancel the Contract
A plaintiff and a defendant entered into a purchase and sale agreement pursuant to which the defendant agreed to sell an undeveloped parcel of land for $1 million. The agreement was contingent upon the purchaser "obtaining all governmental approvals for the development of the parcel within 24 months from the end of a 90-day due diligence period." The contract provided that the date pursuant to which the plaintiff was to obtain the approvals was referred to as the "Approval Date." The contract permitted the plaintiff to extend the Approval Date by three months on two occasions. The closing was to occur 30 days after the Approval Date.
Either party was permitted to cancel the agreement if all necessary approvals had not been obtained by the Approval Date, as extended by the plaintiff. The defendant had granted a 30-day extension of the due diligence period. Thereafter, the plaintiff "obtained most of the governmental approvals contemplated under the agreement."
On Sept. 28, 2017, the plaintiff advised the defendant that the "final permit" from the NYS Dep't of Transportation "was expected within 60 to 90 days." By letter dated Oct. 2, 2017, the defendant cancelled the agreement and directed his attorney to return the down payment. By letter dated Oct. 3, 2017, the plaintiff declared time to be of the essence, "waived the contractual contingency of obtaining all governmental approvals, and stated that it was ready, willing, and able to close."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Disbarred NY Atty Receives 54-Month Prison Sentence After $3M Embezzlement Disbarred NY Atty Receives 54-Month Prison Sentence After $3M Embezzlement](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/da/87/5080e8fe4e388f05ef76aa5a27f9/brooklyn-supreme-court-767x633.jpg)
Disbarred NY Atty Receives 54-Month Prison Sentence After $3M Embezzlement
3 minute read![Unit Owners Sued Board for Failure To Maintain Adequate Fire Insurance: This Week in Scott Mollen’s Realty Law Digest Unit Owners Sued Board for Failure To Maintain Adequate Fire Insurance: This Week in Scott Mollen’s Realty Law Digest](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/newyorklawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/389/2021/07/Scott-Mollen-767x633.jpg)
Unit Owners Sued Board for Failure To Maintain Adequate Fire Insurance: This Week in Scott Mollen’s Realty Law Digest
![Do Tenants Have To Pay if They Want To Stay? Do Tenants Have To Pay if They Want To Stay?](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/05/e8/bdac7ea54619a69bdfea22a83b55/gary-alexis-767x633.jpg)
![Controlling Costs on Capital Construction Projects Controlling Costs on Capital Construction Projects](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/newyorklawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/389/2023/06/Ken-Block-8x10-767x633.jpg)
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250