A Conditional Plea for a Lawyer May Be Unconditionally Problematic
What happens when an attorney takes a conditional plea to a misdemeanor crime, with the agreement of the court and prosecution that after successful completion of the conditions imposed, the attorney will be able to withdraw his or her plea and re-plead to a violation of law and not a crime?
August 25, 2021 at 11:00 AM
7 minute read
It is indisputable that an attorney must respect and follow the law. In the case of the criminal law, an attorney convicted of a crime can be professionally disciplined even where the criminality does not involve the practice of law. Matter of Dolphin, 240 N.Y. 89 (1925); Matter of Nixon, 385 N.Y.S.2d 305 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976).
In New York, an attorney who takes a plea to a misdemeanor is deemed convicted at time of plea or verdict. NY CPL 1.20(13). An attorney convicted of a crime must report that conviction to the appropriate grievance committee within 30 days of the conviction. Failure to report is an act of professional discipline. 22 NYCRR 1240.12(a) [Rules For Attorney Disciplinary Matters]; Judiciary Law 90(4)(c).
Subsection (b) of 22 NYCRR 1240.12 states that upon receipt of the notice of conviction, "the Committee shall investigate the matter …" (emphasis added). Unless the crime is of a type where a non-disciplinary Letter of Advisement is warranted, which in our experience is a rare result, the investigation will result in some level of professional discipline of the attorney. A Committee can investigate and decide on an appropriate sanction itself and issue a Letter of Admonition (22 NYCRR 1240.7(d)(2)(v)). The Admonition is not public, but it is professional discipline. Alternatively, the Committee can commence a formal Disciplinary Proceeding, which likely will result in some level of public discipline (22 NYCRR 1240.8). Public discipline can be a public censure, a period of suspension, or disbarment. 22 NYCRR 1240.8(b) Should the criminal conduct be such that it is adjudged to be "immediately threatening the public interest," or a "Serious Crime" as defined by Judiciary Law 90(4)(d), the attorney could be suspended on an interim basis pending a final determination. 22 NYCRR 1240.9; Jud. Law 90.4(f).
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudgment of Partition and Sale Vacated for Failure To Comply With Heirs Act: This Week in Scott Mollen’s Realty Law Digest
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250