Although not a new phenomenon, virtual depositions became indispensable to the COVID-19 pandemic litigator. Courts, attorneys and their clients were forced to learn how to navigate virtual platforms such as Zoom, Microsoft Teams and Skype, among others, to keep up with legal proceedings while prioritizing safety and health. Now, as we emerge, albeit haltingly, from the pandemic, those depositions are seeing the light of litigation … or at least they are trying to.
As a threshold matter, it is important to appreciate that videoconference depositions and video-recorded depositions are distinctly different devices used in the realm of virtual depositions. “The former uses remote technology to conduct a deposition; the latter records and preserves the deposition in video format that could one day serve as a substitute for live testimony.” Alcorn v. City of Chi., 336 F.R.D. 440, 444. However, the record features of third-party platforms, such as Zoom, have blurred the line between the two. By enabling the record feature, a party is able to record the deposition through the virtual platform and save a copy of that recording, thereby, in a sense, turning a videoconference deposition into a video-recorded deposition.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
