New Federal 'Mandates' for COVID-19 Vaccination: What Do Employers Need To Know Now?
The President's announcement did not immediately change the legal landscape, but it gives employers that want to mandate vaccines more comfort that they can do so and provides practical justification to employees.
September 24, 2021 at 11:15 AM
7 minute read
On Sept. 9, 2021, President Biden announced some sweeping changes in the way the federal government is combating the COVID-19 pandemic as part of the administration's Path out of the Pandemic action plan. In addition to encouraging Americans to get vaccinated, the President announced the following:
- The Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is developing an emergency rule to require employers with 100 or more employees to ensure their workforces are fully vaccinated or show a negative test at least once a week.
- OSHA will also require employers with 100 or more employees to give unvaccinated workers paid time off to get vaccinated.
- He had signed an Executive Order requiring federal contractors to ensure that their employees be vaccinated.
Employers are, understandably, curious as to the details of these rules. As of now, however, the details are few, because the rules have yet to be issued. OSHA may act swiftly on these announcements, but in the federal bureaucracy, "swiftly" is a relative term. The relevant administrative agencies must work through the statutory authority that they have been given by Congress and craft a rule that is within that authority and can, at least arguably, withstand scrutiny by a court.
Mandating Large Employers To Require Vaccination
Usually, federal agencies must go through a relatively lengthy process before issuing binding regulations. However, the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Act) authorizes the Secretary of Labor to issue occupational safety and health regulations upon a finding that a particular standard is necessary to reduce a significant risk of material health impairment. The OSH Act provides that the Secretary shall issue an emergency temporary standard if he or she finds that the standard is necessary to address a grave danger to workers. In issuing emergency standards, the Secretary is required to provide a comprehensive statement of the dangers that justify the emergency standard so that, among other reasons, a court can determine whether the situation fits the statutory standard.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudgment of Partition and Sale Vacated for Failure To Comply With Heirs Act: This Week in Scott Mollen’s Realty Law Digest
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250